Hi Walter,

1. The fact that the Earth does not precess with respect to objects within the Solar System indicates that all the objects within the Solar System experience precession at the same rate. Hence, precession must be due to an "additional motion" of the Solar System. How do scientists who advocate the lunisolar thory react to such rational observations?

2. Now that Curiosity Rover has landed on Mars it gives us a very good opportunity to test this hypothesis. If Mars experiences precession at the same rate as Earth, then it certainly implies that the lunisolar theory is wrong. Curiosity will be spending more than 2 years on Mars - enough to make valid observations. I believe they will also be measuring precessional rates. However, the data that they furnish us should be based on observation only. If they only measure surrogates, and insert it into their faulty lunisolar equation, then we will simply get junk output. I assume your team will be closely monitoring this?

3. You have mentioned that a Brown Dwarf is a candidate for the companion star. But a Brown Dwarf emits very little radiation in the EM spectrum. How then will such a dark star (or a Black Hole/Neutron star for that matter) bring about the radical changes in consciousness during the Yuga Cycle, since our consciousness as well as our material reality is governed by the light reaching us?

Bibhu