Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
>>1. Yes, I get the occasional negative response but most just parrot the standard paradigm and do not dig into the data. If someone has a compelling argument I love to discuss the details, like the lunar data, which is pretty airtight, but that opportunity is rare.

Hello Walter

In the Electric Universe/Plasma Cosmology thinktanks,
some consider the *Saturn Theory as viable.

that our solar system is a composite of captures.

The Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy [sagDEG] is lancing thru or into our quadrant of the Milky way creating instability.

Here it is viewed that Saturn [ A Brown Dwarf star] with Earth and Mars and possibly another cored world which may have been destroyed [exp planet hyp]....were captured by our Sun over a time interval.

the debate as to when this began and when Earth and Mars were free of Saturns orbital lock to become independent and captured into their AU sets by the Sun.

I am with those who view this as occuring farther back in time vs the Talbott and other opinion of the Saturn system breaking up.

Luna is an important ident here,
Luna is mauled 360 with scarring,
had Luna been Earths companion for the claimed time mainstream science says,
Earth would logicaly bear similar scar damage,...yet it quite amazing the contrast.
Mans mythology speaks of a time before the Moon [Luna]
Luna could have been a final sequence capture in the Pleistocene era

Electric Universe/Plasma Cosmology contest the mainstream science version for our solar systems formation,
Expanding earth theory contests the planets history vs continental drift theory.

Venus is considered a recent capture into her AU set as time goes,
more evidence for orbital divergence and chaos vs mainstream uniformity.

I agree that companion stars exist in the cosmos,

that our Sun has a companion influencing it is a consideration and an unknown,
as mentioned.....our quadrant has instability from this collision/interface of the 2 galaxy's,
and if true...[Saturn theory]...captured or stripped out of the intersecting zone,
it reasons that other systems have been altered in thier historic formations.

as reffed by the above,....there are several important idents to consider now....and cannot be dismissed away so easily,
ie....mainstream sciences veracity is called into question now.

T Bird



Post Edited (04-Sep-12 03:16)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Celestial Clock 287 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 20:20
Re: The Celestial Clock 111 Dr. Lew Graham 03-Sep-12 21:51
Re: The Celestial Clock 113 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:33
no lost star, only knowledge.. 110 hendrik dirker 06-Sep-12 16:34
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 74 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 03:20
Re: no lost star, only knowledge.. 116 hendrik dirker 08-Sep-12 17:52
The solar system moves 80 Walter Cruttenden 09-Sep-12 00:20
Re: The solar system moves 111 hendrik dirker 09-Sep-12 15:43
Re: The solar system moves 56 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:15
It is what it is 84 hendrik dirker 11-Sep-12 23:00
Re: It is what it is 99 Walter Cruttenden 12-Sep-12 04:38
Re: The Celestial Clock 77 Corpuscles 03-Sep-12 22:52
Re: The Celestial Clock 76 Walter Cruttenden 03-Sep-12 23:57
Re: The Celestial Clock 76 carolb 04-Sep-12 02:24
Re: The Celestial Clock 43 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:22
Re: The Celestial Clock 91 Nolondil 05-Sep-12 23:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 41 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 20:56
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 106 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 03:08
Luna Capture 99 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Sep-12 04:00
Re: Luna Capture 78 Thunderbird 04-Sep-12 15:51
Mythology on Luna Capture 77 Dr. Lew Graham 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Luna Capture 141 Audrey 05-Sep-12 04:09
Re: Yes, I get the occasional negative response 56 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 86 Bibhu Dev Misra 04-Sep-12 08:42
Re: The Celestial Clock 79 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 19:39
Re: The Celestial Clock 85 Bibhu Dev Misra 05-Sep-12 08:25
Re: The Celestial Clock 90 Walter Cruttenden 05-Sep-12 19:59
Re: The Celestial Clock 53 Sirius7237 04-Sep-12 16:11
Re: The Celestial Clock 69 Walter Cruttenden 04-Sep-12 20:32
Re: The Celestial Clock, 59 michael seabrook 05-Sep-12 21:53
Re: The Celestial Clock, 82 Walter Cruttenden 06-Sep-12 06:54
Re: The Celestial Clock, 76 michael seabrook 06-Sep-12 21:00
The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 80 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 21:16
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 97 carolb 06-Sep-12 22:49
Explain 21 December 2012 precisely? 77 Dr. Lew Graham 06-Sep-12 23:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 81 michael seabrook 07-Sep-12 14:13
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 55 Walter Cruttenden 07-Sep-12 21:24
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 86 michael seabrook 08-Sep-12 12:21
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 53 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:34
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 88 Bibhu Dev Misra 09-Sep-12 07:37
Re: The 'correct' time on the Celestial Clock, 39 Walter Cruttenden 10-Sep-12 07:41
Re: The Celestial Clock 68 Bibhu Dev Misra 07-Sep-12 19:17
Re: The Celestial Clock 87 Walter Cruttenden 08-Sep-12 19:27
Queastion: Earth crust displacement 93 finaltom 30-Sep-12 02:52
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 91 Walter Cruttenden 30-Sep-12 21:56
Re: Queastion: Earth crust displacement 68 finaltom 30-Sep-12 23:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.