You write: "And as to driving a wedge between the two of you that is unfair. It has no validity at all, I am sorry but that is the way I see it and I am afraid that is the way the entire world will see it".
Well I don't think so. "Unfair, no validity at all . . . " OK.
Without wanting to get into anything personal here because its really not the way I operate, or want to, it needs to be said Don so we can get this out of the way.
Why is it then that you posted a thread on Mysteries stating "Gary's book finally released" with no mention at all of Scott?
Thanks for that, but as we know 'The Giza Prophecy' is Scott's book as well - even more-so as it was a project he began and had already prepared written work for. Sorry Don, but I have to say that kind of tactic would have been inciteful to anyone daft enough to take it seriously. What you were doing, or attempting to do was transparent, and it also shows that you have some issues with Scott.
So let's try to be objective in these discussions and put any past grudges behind us. I wouldn't like to think that some personal grudge is lurking beneath your critique of Scott's theories or discoveries, as they are all sound to me and perfectly logical.
Had to be said.
Post Edited (02-Feb-12 21:52)