Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton wrote:

> Archae,

>GH and RB explained in their books that the AE of the 4th
>Dynasty managed to quarry, raise, move and set in place a
>number of stone blocks some of which were upwards of 200+ tons.

Were exactly is this clearly stated in their books about 200+ ton blocks... specific cites please from both Mr. Hancock and Mr. Bavaul? Where did they state the 4th dynasty Egyptians moved the hundreds imaginary blocks in Khafre's Valley temple?

>However, GH and RB wrongly stated the location of these 200+
>ton megalithic blocks and wrongly stated the number of such
>blocks that were extant at Giza.

You missed the incorrect claim that the smallest blocks in the Valley temple were all greater than 50 tons in Hancock & Bauval (1996). You for one, really should not be giving the impression you're leave something out you are aware of.....

Where do they clearly state the existence of the actual 4-5 blocks and any actual facts about them, like they are all at ground level?

>Now, in terms of the actual engineering feat achieved by
>the 4th Dynasty Ancient Egyptians at Giza i.e. the raising and
>moving of 200+ ton blocks (which is the absolute crux of this
>whole issue), the AE of the 4th Dynasty DID INDEED MOVE a
>number of 200+ ton megaliths at Giza. Therefore, irrespective
>of Mr Solehofen's location and quantity corrections, GH
>and RB are MATERIALLY CORRECT
with regards to the
>engineering feat the AE of this period achieved.

Are you now insinuating that they were aware of the 4-5 200 tons blocks at ground level when they wrote Hancock & Bauval (1996) and excepted that the 4th dynasty ancient Egyptians moved them from the quarry to their present location in the construction site and then didn't bother to mention it in their book for some unknown reason, but instead went on and on about how difficult it was for today's modern technology to move hundred of imaginary ones in Khafre's Valley temple, so how could the ancient 4th dynasty Egyptians do it, someone else must have?

You got to be kidding me......

> Do you accept that GH and RB are materially correct, Archae? A
> simple “yes” or “no” will suffice, thanks.

Nope....

I am still waiting for you to provide the quote from GH to the admission that the claims made about the block sizes in the walls of Khafre's Valley temple were in error. Can you provide this please?

Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@hotmail.com)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid building 200 Frank D 22-Jan-09 20:22
Re: Pyramid building 147 Frank D 22-Jan-09 20:25
Re: Pyramid building 136 Scott Creighton 22-Jan-09 22:23
Re: Pyramid building 168 Frank D 22-Jan-09 22:59
Re: Pyramid building 119 Scott Creighton 23-Jan-09 00:21
Re: Pyramid building 171 Frank D 23-Jan-09 10:35
Re: Pyramid building 130 Scott Creighton 23-Jan-09 13:30
Re: Pyramid building 135 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jan-09 23:13
Re: Pyramid building 96 Scott Creighton 23-Jan-09 00:14
Re: Pyramid building 145 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jan-09 03:59
Re: Pyramid building 109 Scott Creighton 23-Jan-09 11:42
Re: Pyramid building 160 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jan-09 19:52
Re: Pyramid building 120 Scott Creighton 23-Jan-09 23:16
Re: Pyramid building 120 Susan Doris 24-Jan-09 19:38
Re: Pyramid building 114 KABOOM 26-Jan-09 15:43
Re: Pyramid building 113 Scott Creighton 26-Jan-09 16:27
Re: Pyramid building 149 Scott Creighton 26-Jan-09 17:23
Re: Pyramid building 141 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jan-09 17:53
Re: Pyramid building 133 Scott Creighton 26-Jan-09 18:30
Re: Pyramid building 117 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jan-09 20:38
Re: Pyramid building 96 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 00:58
Re: Pyramid building 98 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jan-09 21:22
Re: Pyramid building 134 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 21:57
Re: Pyramid building 109 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 21:58
Re: Pyramid building 114 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jan-09 22:22
Re: Pyramid building 126 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 23:06
Re: Pyramid building 130 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jan-09 17:32
Re: Pyramid building 157 Scott Creighton 26-Jan-09 18:54
Re: Pyramid building 145 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jan-09 19:43
Re: Pyramid building 99 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 01:08
Re: Pyramid building 109 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jan-09 21:25
Re: Pyramid building 117 Scott Creighton 27-Jan-09 23:54
Re: Pyramid building 144 Merrell 05-Oct-11 20:40
Re: Pyramid building 116 Ahatmose 06-Oct-11 12:39
Re: Pyramid building 127 Merrell 06-Oct-11 15:45
Re: Pyramid building 165 Ahatmose 06-Oct-11 17:59
Re: Pyramid building 123 Merrell 06-Oct-11 23:49
A Simple Question for Archae 101 Scott Creighton 28-Jan-09 10:54
Re: A Simple Question for Archae 191 Archae Solenhofen 28-Jan-09 15:26
A Simple Answer For the Record 400 Graham Hancock 28-Jan-09 17:22
Re: A Simple Answer For the Record 112 Archae Solenhofen 28-Jan-09 18:01
Re: Pyramid building 128 Frank D 01-Feb-09 13:31
Re: Pyramid building 142 Scott Creighton 01-Feb-09 16:56
Re: Pyramid building 117 papalou 01-Feb-09 21:20
Re: Pyramid building 113 Scott Creighton 01-Feb-09 23:34
Re: Pyramid building 107 Ahatmose 06-Oct-11 03:02
Re: Pyramid building 129 Leon Jenner 06-Oct-11 20:18
Re: Pyramid building 148 michael seabrook 06-Oct-11 22:35
Re: Pyramid building 149 Leon Jenner 07-Oct-11 19:55
Re: Pyramid building 158 shrimperdude 07-Oct-11 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.