SF: Both authors, through further self discovery, now concur that the Gizamids were built ~ 2,500 B.C. and that the size of some of the stones were overstated in the past.
SC: I think a small correction is needed here, Syd. It is my understanding that Graham and Robert misquoted the location of the megaliths and overstated the quantity. That DOES NOT MEAN that there are no 200+ ton blocks elsewhere in the Giza plateau structures - there are a few 200+ ton blocks in use in G2 complex and G3 pyramid as Archae well knows. This is nothing but smoke and mirrors from him.
So, whilst Graham and Robert have put right their original assessments of these blocks, they were still correct to point out that there ARE INDEED a number of 200+ ton megaliths used in the Giza necropolis that had to be quaried, raised and moved into position with only the bronze age technology available to the AE of the 4th Dynasty.
Isn't that correct, Archae?