Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Regarding:
"even if we somehow accept that they misaligned the 45* method by 55 feet over the course of the G3-G1 triple axis."

For your theory on how the pyramid sizes were determined to work; we would have to figure that the people laying out the site could not determine what a length of 240 feet was, that they did not measure to check their alignment. How is this likely, Scott?



Regards,


Rich


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The OCT controversy in 2 Images 231 Robert Bauval 16-Feb-08 17:28
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 16-Feb-08 18:09
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 145 Robert Bauval 17-Feb-08 06:34
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 129 Scott Creighton 17-Feb-08 18:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 118 ninja 18-Feb-08 13:27
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 137 Robert Bauval 18-Feb-08 16:29
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 122 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 17:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Warwick 18-Feb-08 19:22
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 120 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 19:56
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 129 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 17:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 99 Warwick 19-Feb-08 17:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 119 Deep1 18-Feb-08 20:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 20:09
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 130 Robert Bauval 18-Feb-08 20:10
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 20:21
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 132 William Glyn-Jones 18-Feb-08 22:31
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Spiros 19-Feb-08 13:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 137 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 119 Robert Bauval 19-Feb-08 05:49
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 108 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 09:40
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 140 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 11:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 102 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 13:53
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 149 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:17
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 17:40
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 149 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 18:01
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 98 The Elim 19-Feb-08 20:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 carolb 19-Feb-08 19:03
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:14
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 carolb 19-Feb-08 19:45
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 92 Warwick 19-Feb-08 20:32
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 124 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 13:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 124 Robert Bauval 19-Feb-08 07:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Spiros 19-Feb-08 15:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 15:24
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 127 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:31
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 18:10
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 135 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:21
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 152 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Spiros 19-Feb-08 19:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 130 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 20:42
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Spiros 19-Feb-08 21:34
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 127 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:41
Zeus's Sacred Architecture 105 Spiros 20-Feb-08 20:41
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 16:03
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 110 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:47
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 128 ninja 19-Feb-08 18:21
Mod suggestion 111 Deep1 19-Feb-08 18:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:07
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 ninja 19-Feb-08 23:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 140 Robert Bauval 20-Feb-08 05:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 111 ninja 20-Feb-08 13:50
Correction 110 ninja 23-Feb-08 01:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 20-Feb-08 10:06
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 143 ninja 20-Feb-08 18:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 14:30
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 110 Warwick 21-Feb-08 15:46
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 17:12
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 115 ninja 21-Feb-08 22:32
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 23:55
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 22-Feb-08 16:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 168 Cesar 22-Feb-08 18:49
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 22-Feb-08 19:29
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 172 Cesar 23-Feb-08 01:27
How is this likely? 167 Cesar 23-Feb-08 02:43
Re: How is this likely? 92 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 12:59
Re: How is this likely? 137 Cesar 24-Feb-08 03:23
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 17:02
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 116 ninja 22-Feb-08 23:37
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 126 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 17:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:45
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 175 Cesar 19-Feb-08 23:20
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Scott Creighton 20-Feb-08 10:23
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 103 gulsbo 16-Feb-08 19:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 99 Warwick 17-Feb-08 18:26
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 122 Robert Bauval 17-Feb-08 18:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Warwick 17-Feb-08 19:14
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 114 gulsbo 17-Feb-08 19:55


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.