Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Scott,

Quote

The red line passing through G3 is not parallel to the other lines (as agreed)

Actually; more accurately, none of each of the three lines is parallel to any each of the other ones.

Quote

but there is absolutely NOTHING that dictates that from this centre (i.e. the Taylor Point), a cord could not have been stretched in this manner, producing the eventual 'gap' that results in the differential between G1 and G2 base sizes.

That's not quite correct, Scott. Perhaps you may not be familiar with this, but drawing lines on a small diagram like this is very different from the alignments that are actually existent in the structures themselves. What looks good on 'paper' may not actually work in reality. If we take a look at the angular expansion rate produced by the three unparallel lines we find that the base area of G1 is actually about 36,471 square feet too big for the Giza-3 to conform to your proposal.



As you can see your alignment theory is more off than your image suggests, even if we somehow accept that they misaligned the 45* method by 55 feet over the course of the G3-G1 triple axis.



Regards,


Rich


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The OCT controversy in 2 Images 231 Robert Bauval 16-Feb-08 17:28
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 16-Feb-08 18:09
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 145 Robert Bauval 17-Feb-08 06:34
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 129 Scott Creighton 17-Feb-08 18:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 118 ninja 18-Feb-08 13:27
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 138 Robert Bauval 18-Feb-08 16:29
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 122 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 17:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Warwick 18-Feb-08 19:22
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 120 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 19:56
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 129 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 17:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 99 Warwick 19-Feb-08 17:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 119 Deep1 18-Feb-08 20:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 20:09
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 130 Robert Bauval 18-Feb-08 20:10
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Scott Creighton 18-Feb-08 20:21
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 132 William Glyn-Jones 18-Feb-08 22:31
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Spiros 19-Feb-08 13:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 137 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 119 Robert Bauval 19-Feb-08 05:49
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 108 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 09:40
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 140 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 11:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 102 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 13:53
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 149 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:17
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 17:40
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 149 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 18:01
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 98 The Elim 19-Feb-08 20:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 carolb 19-Feb-08 19:03
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:14
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 carolb 19-Feb-08 19:45
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 92 Warwick 19-Feb-08 20:32
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 124 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 13:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 124 Robert Bauval 19-Feb-08 07:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Spiros 19-Feb-08 15:00
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 107 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 15:24
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 127 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 17:31
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 18:10
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 135 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:21
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 152 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:36
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Spiros 19-Feb-08 19:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 130 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 20:42
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Spiros 19-Feb-08 21:34
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 127 William Glyn-Jones 19-Feb-08 23:41
Zeus's Sacred Architecture 105 Spiros 20-Feb-08 20:41
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 16:03
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 110 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:47
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 128 ninja 19-Feb-08 18:21
Mod suggestion 111 Deep1 19-Feb-08 18:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 109 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:07
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 113 ninja 19-Feb-08 23:19
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 140 Robert Bauval 20-Feb-08 05:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 111 ninja 20-Feb-08 13:50
Correction 110 ninja 23-Feb-08 01:18
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 20-Feb-08 10:06
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 143 ninja 20-Feb-08 18:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 14:30
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 110 Warwick 21-Feb-08 15:46
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 17:12
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 115 ninja 21-Feb-08 22:32
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 101 Scott Creighton 21-Feb-08 23:55
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 22-Feb-08 16:54
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 168 Cesar 22-Feb-08 18:49
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Scott Creighton 22-Feb-08 19:29
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 172 Cesar 23-Feb-08 01:27
How is this likely? 168 Cesar 23-Feb-08 02:43
Re: How is this likely? 92 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 12:59
Re: How is this likely? 139 Cesar 24-Feb-08 03:23
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 125 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 17:02
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 116 ninja 22-Feb-08 23:37
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 126 Scott Creighton 23-Feb-08 17:50
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 106 Scott Creighton 19-Feb-08 19:45
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 175 Cesar 19-Feb-08 23:20
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 105 Scott Creighton 20-Feb-08 10:23
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 103 gulsbo 16-Feb-08 19:11
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 99 Warwick 17-Feb-08 18:26
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 122 Robert Bauval 17-Feb-08 18:51
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 104 Warwick 17-Feb-08 19:14
Re: The OCT controversy in 2 Images 114 gulsbo 17-Feb-08 19:55


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.