why any one would willingly have dealings with people who are unable to
focus on the main issues ,especially with all of the personal ''counting
coup '',& trivial point scoring is beyond me .....I admire anyone who can
put up with continual small minded petty meanness,...
The main issue is when someone writes a book, paper, report or provides information to the public it needs to be accurate especially if it is claimed to be scientific based. It also needs to be acquired properly. In court if you present evidence that comes to you wrongly the whole case can be thrown out even if the case is valid.
AND "...small minded petty meanness,..." is a personal attack and I would ask the moderators to start excluding that from all further postings. It is not the first time it has been used to describe my questions.
.My focus &
interest remains how Mr Hoagland saw the possible timelines & his
reasoning behind that.......
Hoagland makes the claim that NASA doctors images and manipulates timelines. However he himself is doing the self same thing. So one cannot sacrifice the method even though the conclusion might be acceptable.