Thank you for your clarification.
I don't say anything directly about original sin in this book; however, my take on the Genesis story would centre around the fact that God made the world in six days because six is a perfect number, mathematically, and he would have to have conformed to his own mathematical laws. This, I get from the Jewish philosopher Philo and the Christian theologian St Augustine.
As regards the role of 'woman' in original sin, I take that to be the definitive introduction of patriarchy into the Bible, and the rubbishing of matriarchy of the previous age. Although I say little about the Age of Taurus in my book, the implication of all that I say is that before the Age of Aries, there were 2000 years under the Age of Taurus. Taurus, as you probably know, is a feminine sign ruled by Venus, and is associated with matriarchy.
The introduction of patriarchy at the beginning of the Age of Aries seems to justify my thesis that the Old Testament comes under Aries and the New Testament comes under Pisces.
I hope that's helpful.
|Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||582||Joyeuse||04-Apr-05 01:23|
|Re: Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||195||Gordon Strachan||04-Apr-05 15:53|
|Re: Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||197||Joyeuse||04-Apr-05 16:53|
|Re: Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||205||Gordon Strachan||07-Apr-05 15:21|
|Original sin||238||Lee McGiffen||09-Apr-05 08:50|
|Limiting female behaviour||239||Kees||09-Apr-05 20:50|
|Re: Limiting female behaviour||228||Lee McGiffen||10-Apr-05 09:42|
|Re: Limiting female behaviour||293||Kees||10-Apr-05 09:53|
|Re: Limiting female behaviour||137||Joyeuse||10-Apr-05 18:02|
|Re: Limiting female behaviour||141||Joyeuse||10-Apr-05 18:54|
|Re: Original sin||209||Joyeuse||10-Apr-05 17:53|
|Re: Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||161||debraregypt||11-Apr-05 13:25|
|Re: Welcome to Gordon Strachan + about the original sin||245||Joyeuse||11-Apr-05 14:23|