Personally, I'm sick of hearing about Dr Zahi Hawass. Graham Hancock has moved on, so I see no reason why I shouldn't. Constantly complaining about the guy isn't going to change anything, but discussing history and evidence and theories -- propelling the exchange of ideas in a positive manner -- is the best way forward. We all know what Hawass is, so I don't see why it must constantly be repeated on GH.com -- "preaching to the converted", is the best way to put it.
On another note, I do hope GH.com is not unreasonably moderated and censored. It should be a vibrant meeting point for the exchange of ideas and differences, conducted in a respectful and courteous manner. This is an ideal I believe in and I do hope that not only GH.com subscribers, but also the administrators and moderators, uphold this ideal and don't go down the murky path of personal prejudice, bias, and unreasonable and narrow-minded censorship.
That said, it really is Graham's website and he has the final say. I just hope those who are acting on his behalf are doing exactly that -- acting on Graham's behalf, and not pursuing their own agendas and opinions.
"Tread softly because you tread on my dreams." -- W B Yeats