Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Tom,

In my view, reincarnation exists or it does not. Not much differenent than the sun rising each day. The sun shines on all regardless of their moral character; it does not differentiate. Now the intellect might ask - What is the justice of this? The answer is that it just is.

If you assume nothing is static then each person can go up or down or a mixture of both in any one lifetime.

The issue of not remembering is profound. Suppose you could remember. Now overlay that on all of the issues within the physical, emotional and mental aspects from the acculturation of this lifetime. It is a blessing that most people cannot recall. Most people are challenged just dealing with the good, bad and indifferent of this lifetime. Only the more purified with good phsical constitutions are really suited to handle multilpe lives superimposing in this lifetime.

Couple these problems with the fact we life in H2O based living tissue bodies. A good analogy is someone going underwater and trying to discern what someone out of the water is saying. In other words, the messages are blocked or garbled or on the other side, the perception looking up is blocked by the cloud (moisture) cover that hides the Sun/Son.

One answer to the question of why people are not more evolved if they have lived multiple times in the physical is that it is easy to get dazed and confused existing consciously and usually less than consciously where the flux of duality obscures the inner reality. Plato's analogy of the cave sums this up pretty well.

As was said in Egypt (paraphrased): I am Isis, no mortal man has ever seen me unveiled. To get to the evolutionary state you postulate, one has to transcend their mortal nature while maintaining a physical body.

Thanks for participating in this forum.

Richard

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tom Harpur is now online 1042 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:03
Wine symbolism 592 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 19:28
Re: Wine symbolism 404 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:50
Re: Wine symbolism 452 wireloop 20-Jul-04 21:20
& bread 348 michael saunders 20-Jul-04 21:28
Re: & bread 361 wireloop 20-Jul-04 22:09
Re: & bread 403 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:44
Re: & bread 352 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:43
Re: Wine symbolism 355 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:38
Welcome Tom Harpur 437 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 400 Graham Hancock 21-Jul-04 22:50
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 465 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:01
A general template or not? 352 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:51
Re: A general template or not? 326 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:02
Re: A general template or not? 309 Kees 20-Jul-04 20:23
Re: A general template or not? 294 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:48
Re: A general template or not? 321 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:52
Re: A general template or not? 446 banah 24-Jul-04 11:51
Re: A general template or not? 453 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: A general template or not? 337 wireloop 20-Jul-04 23:37
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 340 Cross 20-Jul-04 20:20
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 353 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 326 Cross 21-Jul-04 02:48
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 355 Bill Barrington 21-Jul-04 12:13
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 288 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 16:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 289 wireloop 20-Jul-04 20:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 336 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:01
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 364 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 21:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 395 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 324 Milo 20-Jul-04 21:40
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 335 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 321 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 342 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 332 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:46
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 327 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:55
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 334 Milo 20-Jul-04 23:08
Glitch in GHMB, do not reply here 307 Anonymous User 21-Jul-04 01:29
Rob.... 377 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 02:32
Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 347 Kees 20-Jul-04 22:27
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 336 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:04
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 338 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 20:53
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 327 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:44
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 565 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:52
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 342 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 377 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:08
Massey and Orion 323 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 03:06
Re: Massey and Orion 339 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 419 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:27
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 402 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 338 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:46
Welcome back Tom Harpur 361 Kees 21-Jul-04 18:37
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 317 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:43
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 320 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:49
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 426 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:01
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 369 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 278 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:29
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 445 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 278 wireloop 21-Jul-04 19:52
KRST and anti KRST 512 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:20
Re: KRST and anti KRST 451 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:28
Re: KRST and anti KRST 398 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: KRST and anti KRST 340 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:46
Re: KRST and anti KRST 352 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:58
Re: KRST and anti KRST 352 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:52
Re: KRST and anti KRST 390 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:05
Re: KRST and anti KRST 307 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 21:06
Re: KRST and anti KRST 374 Kees 21-Jul-04 21:15
Re: KRST and anti KRST 287 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:43
any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 328 JimLewandowski 21-Jul-04 18:57
Re: any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 361 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:14
Where are all our regular literalists?? 333 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:29
I'd love to debate..... 324 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: I'd love to debate..... 378 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:38
Re: I'd love to debate..... 326 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:12
Re: I'd love to debate..... 455 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:18
Re: I'd love to debate..... 275 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:45
Re: I'd love to debate..... 339 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:56
Re: I'd love to debate..... 333 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 20:09
Re: I'd love to debate..... 308 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:26
Re: I'd love to debate..... 344 michael saunders 22-Jul-04 10:19
Re: I'd love to debate..... 304 Broker 22-Jul-04 22:20
Re: I'd love to debate..... 359 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 12:50
Re: I'd love to debate..... 415 michael saunders 23-Jul-04 18:23
Re: I'd love to debate..... 300 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 23:17
Re: I'd love to debate..... 299 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 01:50
Re: Where are all our regular literalists?? 328 Anne-Marie 21-Jul-04 22:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 271 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 19:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 336 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:04
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 362 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 20:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 334 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 371 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 21:02
Helios 432 Jaimi2 22-Jul-04 03:15
Re: Helios 296 wireloop 22-Jul-04 22:05
Re: Helios 360 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:06
Re: Helios 450 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 14:58
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 340 wireloop 24-Jul-04 04:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 366 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 332 wireloop 24-Jul-04 19:34
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 407 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 335 banah 24-Jul-04 12:15
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 325 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 338 banah 24-Jul-04 21:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 318 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:32
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 334 banah 24-Jul-04 21:41
And Genesis 6:4 will supply your answer 387 JimLewandowski 24-Jul-04 21:40


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.