Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
stated:
"if Christ is a symbol of the totality of the spiritual self in everyone then what would be the purpose of creating a literalized external Christ figure, how could that be purposed?"

response:
I suspect that it was the author's purpose to create a 'historical fictional' Christ as sort of a 'carrier' of modulated, philosophical information.

A good modern day analogy is the transmission and reception of a radio signal. Consider the following 'block diagram'.

Part 1....Transmission:

1) An electronic circuit generates a frequency at 101.1 Khz called ‘The Carrier’.
2) A person with information speaks into a microphone which generates low variable frequencies around 500 Hz called “The Modulator”.
3) The Carrier and Modulator enter simultaneously into another circuit and combine to form a composite signal called ‘THE SIGNAL'.
4) The SIGNAL is amplified and broadcasted via an antenna to the World. Preferrably a wireloop antenna : )

Part 2...Reception:

1) Somebody in the world has an antenna which is 'struck by' the SIGNAL.
2) The 101.1 KHz SIGNAL enters a circuit which interprets THE SIGNAL and separates the The Carrier from The Modulator.
3) The 500 Hz Modulator is amplified and sent to the speakers for audibility.
4) The 101.1 KHz Carrier is discarded.

Historical Fictional Jesus = Carrier
Christ Allegory = Modulator

How do you read The Bible?

Step 1:
Tune to it's carrier frequency (Historical fictional Jesus) looking for a SIGNAL.

Step 2:
Seperate THE SIGNAL and amplify only the modulator (Soul allegory).

Step 3:
Discard the carrier (the tutor of literalism) and listen to the sender's information.

Something like that.

peace,

wireloop

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tom Harpur is now online 950 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:03
Wine symbolism 553 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 19:28
Re: Wine symbolism 380 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:50
Re: Wine symbolism 413 wireloop 20-Jul-04 21:20
& bread 322 michael saunders 20-Jul-04 21:28
Re: & bread 333 wireloop 20-Jul-04 22:09
Re: & bread 378 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:44
Re: & bread 325 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:43
Re: Wine symbolism 328 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:38
Welcome Tom Harpur 414 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 374 Graham Hancock 21-Jul-04 22:50
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 438 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:01
A general template or not? 326 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:51
Re: A general template or not? 299 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:02
Re: A general template or not? 281 Kees 20-Jul-04 20:23
Re: A general template or not? 271 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:48
Re: A general template or not? 296 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:52
Re: A general template or not? 412 banah 24-Jul-04 11:51
Re: A general template or not? 428 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: A general template or not? 300 wireloop 20-Jul-04 23:37
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 312 Cross 20-Jul-04 20:20
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 328 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 301 Cross 21-Jul-04 02:48
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 325 Bill Barrington 21-Jul-04 12:13
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 262 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 16:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 264 wireloop 20-Jul-04 20:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 308 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:01
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 337 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 21:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 371 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 300 Milo 20-Jul-04 21:40
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 309 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 297 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 319 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 304 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:46
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 301 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:55
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 298 Milo 20-Jul-04 23:08
Glitch in GHMB, do not reply here 285 Anonymous User 21-Jul-04 01:29
Rob.... 354 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 02:32
Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 319 Kees 20-Jul-04 22:27
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 308 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:04
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 310 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 20:53
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 301 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:44
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 508 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:52
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 316 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 344 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:08
Massey and Orion 296 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 03:06
Re: Massey and Orion 316 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 390 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:27
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 378 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 311 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:46
Welcome back Tom Harpur 333 Kees 21-Jul-04 18:37
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 288 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:43
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 293 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:49
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 392 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:01
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 344 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 254 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:29
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 421 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 255 wireloop 21-Jul-04 19:52
KRST and anti KRST 471 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:20
Re: KRST and anti KRST 425 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:28
Re: KRST and anti KRST 371 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: KRST and anti KRST 314 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:46
Re: KRST and anti KRST 326 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:58
Re: KRST and anti KRST 316 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:52
Re: KRST and anti KRST 329 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:05
Re: KRST and anti KRST 281 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 21:06
Re: KRST and anti KRST 338 Kees 21-Jul-04 21:15
Re: KRST and anti KRST 264 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:43
any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 303 JimLewandowski 21-Jul-04 18:57
Re: any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 335 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:14
Where are all our regular literalists?? 307 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:29
I'd love to debate..... 299 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: I'd love to debate..... 352 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:38
Re: I'd love to debate..... 299 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:12
Re: I'd love to debate..... 410 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:18
Re: I'd love to debate..... 253 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:45
Re: I'd love to debate..... 312 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:56
Re: I'd love to debate..... 308 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 20:09
Re: I'd love to debate..... 286 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:26
Re: I'd love to debate..... 314 michael saunders 22-Jul-04 10:19
Re: I'd love to debate..... 267 Broker 22-Jul-04 22:20
Re: I'd love to debate..... 335 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 12:50
Re: I'd love to debate..... 388 michael saunders 23-Jul-04 18:23
Re: I'd love to debate..... 271 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 23:17
Re: I'd love to debate..... 277 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 01:50
Re: Where are all our regular literalists?? 300 Anne-Marie 21-Jul-04 22:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 250 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 19:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 312 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:04
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 336 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 20:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 307 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 345 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 21:02
Helios 403 Jaimi2 22-Jul-04 03:15
Re: Helios 273 wireloop 22-Jul-04 22:05
Re: Helios 334 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:06
Re: Helios 423 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 14:58
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 313 wireloop 24-Jul-04 04:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 340 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 303 wireloop 24-Jul-04 19:34
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 380 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 310 banah 24-Jul-04 12:15
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 300 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 309 banah 24-Jul-04 21:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 292 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:32
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 305 banah 24-Jul-04 21:41
And Genesis 6:4 will supply your answer 360 JimLewandowski 24-Jul-04 21:40


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.