Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello Andrew.

Andrew Collins Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What I can say is that the more I read about the
> Achealean peoples of the late Lower Paleolithic
> the more I realise that they were far more
> advanced that we can possibly give them credit.
> They created wooden spears, cut, dressed and
> polished wooden planks, they had methods of
> creating fires on a regular basis, and developed a
> highly consistent method of stone axe manufacture
> that persisted for as much as 1 million years.
> They even had their own system of glyphs
> (something I didn't know until yesterday).
>
> See [originsnet.org]

> The hominin species behind these innovations was
> Homo erectus.

Homo erectus is responsible for the Acheulean handaxe and it is still debated whether he could make fire on demand. The problem with the handaxe is that it did not lead to further innovation and the same axe was made for this million or so years. The first use of spears, however, is attributed to Homo heidelbergensis, who used a stone tool very similar to the Acheulean handaxe, but was much more refined being more symmetrical and finely flaked, in which the first definitive use of controlled fire is found as well.

The "polished wooden plank" you are reffering to is dated to c.400,000BP and is part of the cache of wooden artifacts, including the famed "Schöningen spears", found in Schöningen Germany-a notable Homo heidelbergensis site and not Homo erectus as is sometimes reported that rely on earlier classifications that did not yet distinguish Homo heidelbergensis as a separate species.

I would further note it is currently a matter of debate whether Homo heidelbergenesis even derived from Homo erectus at all. While the two do share common physical traits, there are also enough notable and distinctive divergences Homo eructus may in fact not be their progenitor. Regardless, I do not think it is warranted to describe the two as the "Archulean peoples" as it implies a "cultural" continuity which other than the similarities of the Archulean handaxe simply does not exist only further compounded by the morphological differences as well, notably a much larger cranial capacity. The distinction between Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergenesis is one worth making.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 29-Dec-19 04:43 by Thanos5150.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Shamanic civilization 1552 PB Bytes 06-Oct-19 15:52
Re: Shamanic civilization 208 Greg Little 07-Oct-19 14:59
Re: Shamanic civilization 197 PB Bytes 07-Oct-19 18:31
Re: Shamanic civilization 197 Greg Little 07-Oct-19 21:30
Re: Shamanic civilization 212 Andrew Collins Author 10-Oct-19 00:09
Re: Shamanic civilization 188 drrayeye 10-Oct-19 18:06
Re: Shamanic civilization 188 Andrew Collins 17-Oct-19 22:54
Re: Shamanic civilization 193 Thanos5150 20-Oct-19 05:59
Re: Shamanic civilization 176 Andrew Collins 17-Oct-19 22:58
Re: Shamanic civilization 196 PB Bytes 10-Oct-19 18:44
Re: Shamanic civilization 181 Andrew Collins 17-Oct-19 23:02
Re: Shamanic civilization 206 Eddie Larry 10-Oct-19 21:52
Re: Shamanic civilization 184 Andrew Collins 17-Oct-19 23:13
Re: Shamanic civilization 197 Eddie Larry 18-Oct-19 20:52
Re: Shamanic civilization 176 Greg Little 20-Oct-19 19:58
Re: Shamanic civilization 172 seasmith 21-Oct-19 03:16
Re: Shamanic civilization 292 Greg Little 21-Oct-19 10:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.