Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Presuming you accept that there is a star pattern in the heavens surrounding the Globe, which represents actual evidence.. 'Side on' to Earth, the linear trend of changing star coordinates, according to classical theory*, ought to be parallel wrt the plane of the ecliptic. Thus, on opposite 'sides' and 'all around', depicting a revolutionary action, thereby confirming the activity being precession related - albeit Lunar-Solar gravity generated. (*my model incorporates a diagonal element)

Granted the above could be assimilated by binary motion... the imaginary path of travel by our Sun would be harmonious with the trend in terms of the plane thereof. However, the view from Earth diametrically opposed of its directional heading -i.e. opposite sides of its supposed path in accompanying the Sun on a binary orbit, implies the changing star coordinates incurred thereby, to be in conflict with the established rotary trend. Ignoring that detail and considering the destination of the Sun being complimentary, parallel, with Earth's orbital plane, the Sun's imagined eccentricity would never-the-less comprise an astounding diameter - extending beyond our SS by exhorbitant distance. In principle thus far, so good...

Bearing in mind, by implication of the above conditions, the place of hiding of the binary star needs to conform with the general plane of the planets in our SolarSystem - i.o.w. in a defined locale. Our entire SS, no less, is required to revolve around the object, which needless to say, demands gravity associated with a HUGE mass - that we are led to believe is conveniently cloaked by invisibility ;-) The perigee of, not only the Sun's parabolic path but our whole SolarSystem along with it, respective said object, will impose certain limits pertaining distance - governed by relevant physics. These factors, in combination, determine the DarkStar to be located a looong way out - accordingly pushing the parameter of our Sun's required parabolic orbit even further. Matters that Tommy the TimeTravellingTurtle ought to have contemplated prior to embarking on his fictitious journey.

Now, let's venture top of the World - upward, where respective of the Poles, the stars -- continuous from equatorial / ecliptic plane region -- envelop Earth in all directions and extend over the Poles. The view, perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic, reveal evidenced circular precession related star motion around the pole of the ecliptic (centered on the EclipticPole) - portraying such to be consistent with -- axial rotation -- established trend and not compatable, in the least, with what the orbital action inferred above, would produce. Emphasized on previous occasions, the particular pattern of changing coordinates demand a binary object located in close proximity - stars don't lie (thumping the book ;-) Genesis 1:14

You can't have it both ways -- the binary proposal creates its own CheckMate abberation -- where XY lateral motion is contradictory as well as with Z axis. Considering velocity of travel associated with orbital distance -VS- the perceivable circumpolar rate invokes more of the bizarre. I did not even address true Polar wander, which may not be obvious in the short term, however foresee the problem going really haywire exponentially with time. Our magnificent shiny star is as rock-steady stationary as ever. The exotic claims put out by the BinaryResearch... Institution :-D cannot be seriously entertained.

ps. Investigate apsidal precession for a mind-bending puzzle of its own unique kind... an interesting proposal, more so than the binary bull... however, falsifiable also by star pattern.




Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 24-Aug-19 18:36 by hendrik dirker.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15600 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 400 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 388 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 299 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 310 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 318 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 268 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 302 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 279 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 305 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 276 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 275 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 306 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 282 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 282 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 401 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 316 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 341 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 339 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 300 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 275 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 281 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 276 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 270 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 266 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 274 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 270 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 276 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 273 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 264 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 250 PB Bytes 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 260 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 250 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 262 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 254 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 245 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 248 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 240 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 268 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 273 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 282 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 290 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 287 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 260 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 274 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 301 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 264 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 276 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 315 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 1000 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 322 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 303 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.