Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...
>
>
Quote
Even the simple wiki article on the
> subject Axial Precession is rather comprehensive
> about what is known

>
>
>
> Axial Precession is unproven. "Sealing the deal"
> on an unproven assumption is not scientific. As I
> have endeavored to highlight, Axial Precession may
> not exist
. Other forces could be at play.

Surely, you acknowledge that the effect is observable and measurable?

Matey, you are too intelligent to fall for that Flat Earth rubbish? Please confirm!

If you are merely stating humans have never observed and recorded a full cycle, then I agree. However if there is "other forces at play" then those forces must produce the same effect EXACTLY as axial precession.

I seem to recall you have some affinity with the notion of our Sun being in binary motion with Sirius?
If so how does that produce exactly the same effect?

>
>
>
Quote
there is little reason to suspect it would
> be a massive departure from the range observed for
> well since the Greeks 2000 plus years ago.

>
>
>
> Not sure what you mean here. Are you suggesting
> that because the phenomenon of Precession has been
> measured for 2000 years then that, in a dynamic
> universe, this measurement can be extrapolated
> back in time to (Name a Date) with accuracy?

The deviations in precession rate are extremely slight so that would justify expecting minimal effect on an extrapolated precession. Unless there are massive UNKNOWNS yet to be experienced?
Do you know of any reason to expect such unknowns?

>
>
>
Quote
You know darned well there is no known
> evidence of any civilization lasting for 26000
> years and recording periodic precessions. The
> estimate is made by observing smaller chunks of
> time.

>
>
>
>
> Somebody seems to think otherwise.
>
>
Quote
We know this, because at the end of last
> year, with the help of Alistair Coombs, I proved,
> in a scientific sense, that these animal symbols,
> in Western European cave art at least, can be
> interpreted as the same constellations evident at
> Göbekli Tepe, which in turn are the same as the
> ones we use today.
>
> Of course, some of the symbols have changed over
> the intervening 40,000 years. For example, it
> appears that for at least 30,000 years, the feline
> symbol was used to represent the constellation
> Cancer, and likewise the bovine symbol was used to
> represent Capricornus.

>
>

Well! that is just utter fanciful rubbish.!
The poor self deluded man cannot see a depiction of a recognisable animal, on look at a vase or cave wall , without invoking constellations !




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 14-Aug-19 21:46 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15588 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 391 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 382 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 293 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 303 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 311 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 261 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 296 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 273 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 296 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 270 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 269 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 300 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 276 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 275 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 394 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 310 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 334 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 333 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 293 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 269 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 274 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 269 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 264 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 260 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 267 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 264 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 269 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 267 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 258 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 244 PB Bytes 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 254 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 244 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 255 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 248 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 238 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 241 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 233 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 262 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 267 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 276 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 283 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 279 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 253 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 267 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 294 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 253 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 270 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 307 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 987 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 315 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 295 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.