Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The length of the Great Year varies according to different sources. I believe that the method used by Hancock et al is 71.6 x 360 = 25776 years. Sri Yukteswar in "Holy Science" postulates 24000 years.

To date there does not appear to exist confirmation of either postulations.

In fact, it could be that the Rate of Precession may not be standard at all, but may vary due to forces exerted by cosmic bodies.

How many cycles of the Great Year have been accurately measured so as to fit the Scientific Method ie testable and repeatable, so that the deductions drawn from hypotheses based on the zodiac can be considered valid?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15600 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 400 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 389 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 299 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 310 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 318 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 268 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 302 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 280 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 305 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 276 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 275 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 306 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 282 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 282 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 401 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 316 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 341 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 340 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 300 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 275 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 281 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 277 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 271 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 266 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 274 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 271 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 276 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 273 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 264 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 250 PB Bytes 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 260 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 250 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 262 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 254 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 245 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 248 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 240 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 268 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 273 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 283 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 290 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 287 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 260 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 274 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 302 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 264 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 276 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 315 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 1000 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 323 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 304 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.