Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The length of the Great Year varies according to different sources. I believe that the method used by Hancock et al is 71.6 x 360 = 25776 years. Sri Yukteswar in "Holy Science" postulates 24000 years.

To date there does not appear to exist confirmation of either postulations.

In fact, it could be that the Rate of Precession may not be standard at all, but may vary due to forces exerted by cosmic bodies.

How many cycles of the Great Year have been accurately measured so as to fit the Scientific Method ie testable and repeatable, so that the deductions drawn from hypotheses based on the zodiac can be considered valid?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 14715 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 239 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 227 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 149 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 154 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 157 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 129 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 147 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 128 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 133 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 124 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 133 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 156 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 129 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 122 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 208 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 139 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 179 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 165 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 140 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 122 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 130 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 122 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 118 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 113 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 121 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 123 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 129 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 125 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 120 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 107 Poster Boy 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 113 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 108 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 117 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 105 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 106 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 102 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 102 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 118 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 130 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 130 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 131 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 130 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 111 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 109 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 134 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 117 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 133 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 159 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 642 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 167 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 153 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.