Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The length of the Great Year varies according to different sources. I believe that the method used by Hancock et al is 71.6 x 360 = 25776 years. Sri Yukteswar in "Holy Science" postulates 24000 years.

To date there does not appear to exist confirmation of either postulations.

In fact, it could be that the Rate of Precession may not be standard at all, but may vary due to forces exerted by cosmic bodies.

How many cycles of the Great Year have been accurately measured so as to fit the Scientific Method ie testable and repeatable, so that the deductions drawn from hypotheses based on the zodiac can be considered valid?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15560 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 381 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 370 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 282 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 292 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 299 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 250 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 285 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 263 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 285 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 259 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 257 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 289 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 265 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 262 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 378 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 299 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 323 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 322 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 283 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 258 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 263 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 259 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 254 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 249 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 255 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 254 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 258 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 256 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 248 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 232 PB Bytes 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 242 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 232 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 245 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 238 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 227 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 229 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 222 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 250 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 254 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 266 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 272 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 269 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 240 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 255 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 284 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 238 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 257 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 292 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 961 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 299 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 284 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.