Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The length of the Great Year varies according to different sources. I believe that the method used by Hancock et al is 71.6 x 360 = 25776 years. Sri Yukteswar in "Holy Science" postulates 24000 years.

To date there does not appear to exist confirmation of either postulations.

In fact, it could be that the Rate of Precession may not be standard at all, but may vary due to forces exerted by cosmic bodies.

How many cycles of the Great Year have been accurately measured so as to fit the Scientific Method ie testable and repeatable, so that the deductions drawn from hypotheses based on the zodiac can be considered valid?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15213 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 287 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 275 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 190 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 198 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 209 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 167 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 188 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 170 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 181 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 166 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 174 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 203 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 170 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 165 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 264 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 182 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 220 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 217 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 187 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 165 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 171 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 166 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 161 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 154 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 163 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 164 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 170 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 166 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 162 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 144 Poster Boy 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 153 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 146 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 154 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 147 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 142 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 140 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 136 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 160 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 169 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 178 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 182 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 177 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 157 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 157 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 184 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 156 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 172 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 202 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 764 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 213 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 192 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.