Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The length of the Great Year varies according to different sources. I believe that the method used by Hancock et al is 71.6 x 360 = 25776 years. Sri Yukteswar in "Holy Science" postulates 24000 years.

To date there does not appear to exist confirmation of either postulations.

In fact, it could be that the Rate of Precession may not be standard at all, but may vary due to forces exerted by cosmic bodies.

How many cycles of the Great Year have been accurately measured so as to fit the Scientific Method ie testable and repeatable, so that the deductions drawn from hypotheses based on the zodiac can be considered valid?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 14035 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 144 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 156 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 105 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 111 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 110 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 87 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 99 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 87 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 87 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 82 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 87 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 105 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 83 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 77 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 137 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 95 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 111 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 104 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 97 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 83 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 90 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 80 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 78 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 69 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 77 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 83 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 83 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 84 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 77 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 63 Poster Boy 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 68 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 64 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 72 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 59 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 68 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 60 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 65 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 76 Poster Boy 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 90 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 73 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 83 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 70 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 66 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 70 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 88 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 74 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 81 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 80 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 435 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 92 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 108 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.