Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
greengirl5 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is a good one, Poster Boy! 1618! As a lover
> of all that stuff with Fibonacci's I can see how
> you must find it interesting. But why would the
> universe have put those numbers on an old writing,
> just to prove a point? A bit far fetched, however,
> all my number 26'es in my family is also weird.
> Are they something to do with structures, or just
> sign posts? Some of course will say "coincidence"
> but that is the easy way out.
>
> :). GG.

Hi GG,

Before I try to directly address your questions, let me say what I think may be the most important thing in all of this, which is that synchronicity - if this stuff is non-random - simply reminds us that our present paradigms are inadequate to explain syncs. Period.

Beyond the random interpretation, I see two possibilities, which is about all I've heard from anyone anyway.

These syncs may be design, imparted by an extremely advanced agent. If that's true, then perhaps their function is spiritual in nature, to inspire "wonderment", as discreet reminders that we are not alone. Gentle signs that are there to be embraced or ignored, ones seamlessly installed within the greater unfoldment of mundane cause and effect.

The other idea that syncs are based on a mind-matter connection. What's interesting to me, when I think of the Mayans in this context, is this: They really believed in the coming of a new WORLD age. What of their fixation on that subject, which would have occurred for centuries, during the time when they refined the Long Count (which was designed to identify when the world change would occur), which we know was finished no earlier than the 1st century BC or 21000 years ago...

What if the Mayans said to themselves, (with a requisite conviction and attention that may have something to do with Darryl's ability to perform PK), throughout the time they refined the LC, that the world will change around "13.0.0.0.0", which would have been their dating of the turning of the 5125 year, 133 day Long Count.

If we dispense with having to explain their uncanny precision in terms of mundane cause and effect, the door is open to the possibility that this change could be articulated in 'future terms', eg through the 'future' foundational elements, trans Mayan ones, which in my post include the following: the Julian-Gregorian calendar re 1618, the Hindu Arabic number system, re '1618', Phi and the Fibonacci?

All of these things irrefutably came along after the Mayans. When we dispense with our mundane conditioning, the simple fact is that the Mayans didn't have to know about the particular nature of these things or just be really really lucky. They only had to know when the world would change. And as things worked out, when you take their parochial view and project the results forward, some 2100 years, to exactly when they said the changes would kick in, you have a very direct hit on multiple counts. The Julian-Gregorian and the Hindu Arabic number systems are not just big things pertaining to other cultures. They were, in fact, the dominant global forms of expression in 2012, when the 'world' would change, according to the Mayans.

But what if consciousness played a part, and the Mayans' devotion to the idea of when world change occurred influenced the outcome? This is another way that synchronicity may be explained, and our precedent is our understanding of quantum mechanics, where the subject is seen to influence the outcome in ways that defy mundane cause and effect, AND where the rules of time are seen to be something other than what we think of them.

My further thought, however, is that maybe the Fibonacci's reach extends to an as-of-yet-unrecognized causation where syncs are explained. If these two 1618's are due to a kind of mental causation, then the Fibonacci correlations are certainly on point. In Matt 16:18 it seems clear that Jesus was talking about a line of succession, or at least very plausible. The same is certainly true of how the Mayans viewed the turning of the Long Count, that it would mark a renewal of humanity.

PB

]

>
> Poster Boy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I have always found this passage to be
> > interesting, On the point you raise, it is
> > recorded that Jesus said, "I will build my
> church,
> > and the gates of Hades will not overcome it"
> > (Matthew 16:18).
> >
> > What I find fascinating, is that 1.618 is the
> > number for Phi, which in turn is the basis for
> the
> > Fibonacci sequence, which in turn is known to
> > relate, throughout nature, to renewal or
> > regeneration. In the case of the Fibonacci
> > sequence, the sequence is based on the renewal
> of
> > the same arithmetic function, of adding the two
> > adjacent numbers in the sequence to get the
> next
> > one in the sequence. Dividing the greater
> number
> > next to the adjacent smaller one produces
> > ever-closer approximations to 1.618, hence the
> > 'golden ratio'.
> >
> > As a mathematical metaphor, the verse Matt
> 16.18
> > is highly complementary to the Fibonacci's
> noted
> > properties. That's because this story is
> believed
> > to involve Jesus appointing Peter as the first
> > leader of the Church, aka the first Pope. In
> > other words, Peter is regarded, as a tenet of
> > Catholic dogma, as the first person in a line
> of
> > succession that is in turn based on
> > renewal.
> >
> > Those are the facts. Whether it is a random
> > coincidence is one thing, but at times like this
> I
> > think it is fair and reasonable comment to
> mention
> > a mechanism to which self-professed rational
> (as
> > in reasonable) humans are seen to defer: As
> > improbability rises, at a certain point
> 'chance'
> > is seen to be a poor if not irrelevant
> explanation
> > of events.
> >
> > Finally, if anyone is interested, here's a link
> to
> > a related post where 1618 appears, at a quite
> > perfect time, in thematic (renewal) relation to
> > the turning of the Mayan Long Count calendar.
> >
> >
> [grahamhancock.com]
>
> > ,1124610#msdOrionurationg-1124610

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Parapsychology and wonderment 33863 Darryl Sloan 03-Jun-19 19:34
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 177 greengirl5 03-Jun-19 23:08
u-tube 167 greengirl5 04-Jun-19 03:54
Re: u-tube 161 greengirl5 04-Jun-19 06:17
Re: u-tube 162 Darryl Sloan 04-Jun-19 19:02
Re: u-tube 160 Darryl Sloan 04-Jun-19 18:58
Re: u-tube 135 greengirl5 04-Jun-19 22:29
Meaningful dreams 164 Darryl Sloan 04-Jun-19 18:47
Re: Meaningful dreams 136 greengirl5 04-Jun-19 22:46
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 156 Poster Boy 04-Jun-19 22:29
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 154 greengirl5 04-Jun-19 23:08
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 150 Eddie Larry 05-Jun-19 01:08
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 150 greengirl5 05-Jun-19 03:15
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 199 Eddie Larry 05-Jun-19 20:51
Who was Jesus? 174 Darryl Sloan 06-Jun-19 11:27
Re: Who was Jesus? 145 greengirl5 06-Jun-19 14:37
Re: Who was Jesus? 168 Poster Boy 06-Jun-19 15:49
Re: Who was Jesus? 147 greengirl5 06-Jun-19 22:21
Re: Who was Jesus? 148 Poster Boy 06-Jun-19 23:06
Re: Who was Jesus? And who were the Mayans? 153 greengirl5 06-Jun-19 23:40
And who were the Mayans? 152 Poster Boy 07-Jun-19 15:41
Winter solstice 2012 143 greengirl5 07-Jun-19 22:40
Re: Winter solstice 2012 142 Poster Boy 07-Jun-19 23:21
Re: Winter solstice 2012 138 greengirl5 07-Jun-19 23:51
Re: Who was Jesus? 148 Darryl Sloan 08-Jun-19 20:16
Questions 158 drrayeye 08-Jun-19 20:47
Re: Questions 163 Darryl Sloan 10-Jun-19 19:02
Re: Questions and maybe some answers? 136 greengirl5 11-Jun-19 00:03
Re: Questions and maybe some answers? 142 Darryl Sloan 14-Jun-19 09:28
Good and evil 132 greengirl5 14-Jun-19 22:59
Re: Good and evil 129 Darryl Sloan 17-Jun-19 11:19
Re: Questions 144 drrayeye 11-Jun-19 07:19
Re: Questions 132 Darryl Sloan 14-Jun-19 09:13
Scientists and Dualism 131 drrayeye 14-Jun-19 16:30
Re: Scientists and Dualism 137 Darryl Sloan 17-Jun-19 12:03
Re: Scientists and Dualism 136 drrayeye 17-Jun-19 16:10
Re: Scientists and Dualism 143 Susan Doris 17-Jun-19 17:25
Consciousness and the perceptual environment 130 drrayeye 18-Jun-19 04:10
Re: Who was Jesus? 154 Poster Boy 08-Jun-19 21:11
Re: Who was Jesus? 142 Darryl Sloan 10-Jun-19 19:20
A scholarly alternative 147 drrayeye 07-Jun-19 06:46
Re: A scholarly alternative 149 Darryl Sloan 10-Jun-19 19:09
Re: A scholarly alternative 147 Eddie Larry 11-Jun-19 21:19
Re: A scholarly alternative 141 greengirl5 11-Jun-19 22:11
Re: A scholarly alternative 160 Eddie Larry 11-Jun-19 22:21
Re: A scholarly alternative 143 SandyJesse 15-Jun-19 05:14
Re: A scholarly alternative 134 Darryl Sloan 17-Jun-19 11:23
Tiberius Julius Cotys Philocaesar Eusebes 139 Eddie Larry 17-Jun-19 22:32
Re: Tiberius Julius Cotys Philocaesar Eusebes 141 SandyJesse 18-Jun-19 02:56
Re: Tiberius Julius Cotys Philocaesar Eusebes 135 Eddie Larry 18-Jun-19 03:03
Re: A scholarly alternative 141 Darryl Sloan 13-Jun-19 11:58
Re: A scholarly alternative 153 Eddie Larry 13-Jun-19 14:04
Re: A scholarly alternative 132 Darryl Sloan 17-Jun-19 11:28
Re: A scholarly alternative 138 Eddie Larry 17-Jun-19 13:08
Follow me - on Facebook....... 134 greengirl5 17-Jun-19 23:10
Re: Follow me - on Facebook....... 142 Eddie Larry 18-Jun-19 01:42
After the resurrection...... 133 greengirl5 18-Jun-19 06:02
Re: After the resurrection...... 131 Eddie Larry 18-Jun-19 13:32
Well said 141 drrayeye 18-Jun-19 04:38
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 155 Darryl Sloan 06-Jun-19 10:05
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 143 Darryl Sloan 05-Jun-19 14:48
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 147 Poster Boy 05-Jun-19 15:37
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 141 Darryl Sloan 06-Jun-19 10:55
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 142 Poster Boy 06-Jun-19 15:38
au contraire 166 drrayeye 04-Jun-19 23:15
Re: au contraire 147 Darryl Sloan 05-Jun-19 15:05
Re: au contraire 160 drrayeye 05-Jun-19 19:56
Re: au contraire 152 Darryl Sloan 06-Jun-19 10:08
Re: au contraire 144 greengirl5 06-Jun-19 13:48
Re: au contraire 735 Poster Boy 06-Jun-19 15:31
Re: au contraire 150 drrayeye 06-Jun-19 16:11
Re: au contraire 152 Poster Boy 06-Jun-19 16:16
Consciousness 143 greengirl5 06-Jun-19 23:27
Our brains 154 greengirl5 07-Jun-19 00:56
Re: Consciousness 139 Darryl Sloan 13-Jun-19 11:50
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 160 Susan Doris 07-Jun-19 06:03
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 163 greengirl5 07-Jun-19 07:47
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 158 Susan Doris 07-Jun-19 07:53
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 152 greengirl5 07-Jun-19 23:59
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 153 Darryl Sloan 08-Jun-19 19:22
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 142 greengirl5 08-Jun-19 22:44
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 153 Susan Doris 09-Jun-19 05:23
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 155 SandyJesse 09-Jun-19 06:24
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 145 Susan Doris 09-Jun-19 07:19
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 147 greengirl5 09-Jun-19 09:12
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 145 Susan Doris 09-Jun-19 10:03
There it is again 139 greengirl5 09-Jun-19 12:07
Re: There it is again 152 Susan Doris 09-Jun-19 14:49
You know? 157 greengirl5 10-Jun-19 00:36
Re: You know? 142 Susan Doris 10-Jun-19 10:49
Re: You know? 143 greengirl5 10-Jun-19 13:47
Re: You know? 149 Eddie Larry 11-Jun-19 00:09
Re: You know? 129 Eddie Larry 11-Jun-19 21:43
Re: You know? 137 greengirl5 11-Jun-19 21:58
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 165 SandyJesse 10-Jun-19 06:38
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 168 greengirl5 10-Jun-19 09:48
How to make gold 160 greengirl5 15-Jun-19 07:47
Re: How to make gold 135 Darryl Sloan 17-Jun-19 11:07
Re: How to make gold 159 Susan Doris 17-Jun-19 17:31
Re: How to make gold 132 Darryl Sloan 18-Jun-19 08:15
Re: How to make gold 135 Susan Doris 18-Jun-19 09:41
Re: How to make gold 138 greengirl5 18-Jun-19 13:10
Re: How to make gold 136 Susan Doris 18-Jun-19 13:37
Re: How to make gold 135 greengirl5 18-Jun-19 23:30
Re: How to make gold 131 drrayeye 18-Jun-19 18:09
Re: How to make gold 129 greengirl5 18-Jun-19 23:14
Re: How to make gold 127 Darryl Sloan 20-Jun-19 11:44
The "para" is not going away, it is getting stronger. 129 greengirl5 20-Jun-19 23:32
Re: The "para" is not going away, it is getting stronger. 131 Susan Doris 21-Jun-19 09:43
Re: The "para" is not going away, it is getting stronger. 119 greengirl5 21-Jun-19 12:18
Re: How to make gold 135 Susan Doris 21-Jun-19 06:18
Re: How to make gold 121 greengirl5 21-Jun-19 12:14
Re: How to make gold 136 Susan Doris 21-Jun-19 14:42
Re: How to make gold 129 greengirl5 21-Jun-19 23:30
Re: How to make gold 131 Susan Doris 22-Jun-19 05:14
Re: How to make gold 124 greengirl5 22-Jun-19 06:26
Re: How to make gold 129 Susan Doris 22-Jun-19 07:04
Re: How to make gold 134 greengirl5 22-Jun-19 23:49
Re: How to make gold 121 Darryl Sloan 24-Jun-19 18:25
defying naturalistic explanations 126 drrayeye 24-Jun-19 23:32
Re: defying naturalistic explanations 111 Darryl Sloan 26-Jun-19 21:09
Science vs. speculation 352 drrayeye 26-Jun-19 21:57
Re: How to make gold 123 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 05:57
Great advice to scientists! 124 greengirl5 25-Jun-19 07:24
Re: Great advice to scientists! 122 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 10:07
Re: Great advice to scientists! 128 greengirl5 26-Jun-19 00:25
a very creative scientist shares his insights 118 drrayeye 25-Jun-19 11:50
Re: a very creative scientist shares his insights 136 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 14:00
Re: How to make gold 119 Darryl Sloan 24-Jun-19 18:09
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 136 rulebook54 24-Jun-19 22:35
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 130 greengirl5 25-Jun-19 00:31
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 121 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 06:05
Re: Parapsychology and wonderment 117 greengirl5 25-Jun-19 07:11
Big consciousness, little consciousness. 123 greengirl5 25-Jun-19 02:37


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.