Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
>
Quote

I find that fractional separation of the
> mind into categories of real and unreal are rather
> difficult compromises of the whole brain/body
> experience that we humans actually consider as
> fundamentally actual,


Susan, you quoted my statement but did not comment on it. Is it possible that you had no comment because you did not consider the question valid, or responsive to anything in your categories of intelligible queries?

I just want to know two things: you always say that other people's INTERPRETATION is suspect. Another thing you always proscribe is the "100% verifiable and confirmed evidence of all objective tests" as the contention of your viewpoint.

I would like to be you, for a moment. Yes, interpretation is the key component to actual reliable proof of any mental assignment of inference. And yes, 100% verifiable evidence, by whatever mechanical means, supposedly if that means is calibrated by a sensor of meticulous accuracy, is the ONLY ABLE MEANS of providing a concensus to the test at hand.

Now, I do not dispute any preference one way or another. It is, or it is not; a peculiar compromise in this consideration. What I am after is the SUSPICION OF VALIDATION through all possible scenarios of exoneration and clarification of the matter at hand; namely, the test of individual subjectivity and testimony, were they superficial or extraordinarily adept at providing a result that composes both a viewpoint and a HISTORY of completeness in the core of such investigation. I do rather prefer a result that can be reworked by other tests of actuality. It is paramount that physical conditions be satisfied in every test of each, and every, test of the experience of a person's "information".

I think that, imperceptibly, a person CAN ONLY GIVE THEIR INTERPRETATION at any given moment according to their current bias of knowledge, and cannot be distinguished as either superior or inferior to the model of factual indices of individual perceptions. It is more than an individual stake on mental reliabllity can do, considering the outcome of "interpretive" testimony that comes with each and every person due to their own evolutionary development in due process of mental states of subjectivity.

The objective is temporary in it's fleeting test measurements at the time of gauging the status of a claim of personal conviction. The subjective, elongated station of a lifetime interpretation is far reaching and lasting than a mere test for an hour to prove that person's experience as valid, or not.

Is it not more comforting to know that a person's "take" on any subject is a reasonible explanation for their life purpose, rather than a conflicting attitude of concern for their well-being? As it is said, "let it be".

You may, or may not, convince me of another, elusive and temporary test of quality of interpretation, but I am convinced, thoroughly that a person's testimony is valid, within their own rights as a person. I concur with such a testimony, even yours, in liberty of conscience and contemplation (the long thoughts of personal intuition).

There it is: no more, no less.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 1337 Susan Doris 08-Jan-19 16:21
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 157 EvelynRysdyk 10-Jan-19 17:27
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 133 Susan Doris 10-Jan-19 19:45
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 127 cloister 10-Jan-19 20:11
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 117 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 14:56
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 114 cloister 11-Jan-19 16:09
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 111 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 19:35
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 112 cloister 11-Jan-19 19:56
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 133 EvelynRysdyk 11-Jan-19 00:40
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 124 greengirl5 11-Jan-19 08:59
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 122 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 13:02
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 118 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 13:27
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 123 EvelynRysdyk 11-Jan-19 20:33
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 93 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 14:06
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 118 greengirl5 11-Jan-19 23:16
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 107 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 06:15
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 104 greengirl5 12-Jan-19 12:24
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 110 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 13:07
Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 102 Itatw70s 17-Jan-19 20:39
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 96 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 14:48
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 89 Itatw70s 21-Jan-19 02:17
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 84 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 06:26
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 114 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 13:19
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 118 EvelynRysdyk 12-Jan-19 17:04
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 143 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 18:36
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 96 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 15:01
Red Herrings 105 drrayeye 17-Jan-19 19:05
Re: Red Herrings 106 Itatw70s 17-Jan-19 23:47
Re: Red Herrings 101 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 09:00
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 95 Susan Doris 19-Jan-19 12:42
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 95 EvelynRysdyk 19-Jan-19 17:23
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 94 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 10:27
Spirit 90 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 20:57
Re: Spirit 88 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 07:11
Re: Spirit 86 greengirl5 21-Jan-19 11:31
Re: Spirit 83 Eddie Larry 21-Jan-19 16:32
Re: Spirit 88 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 17:08
Re: Spirit 91 greengirl5 21-Jan-19 20:37
Re: Spirit 88 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 06:24
Re: Spirit 86 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 07:23
Re: Spirit 83 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 07:41
Re: Spirit 82 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 07:57
Re: Spirit 82 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 08:19
Re: Spirit 88 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 09:47
Re: Spirit 91 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 12:40
Re: Spirit 87 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 21:04
Re: Spirit 80 Susan Doris 23-Jan-19 10:25
Re: Spirit 160 greengirl5 23-Jan-19 12:10
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 101 Poster Boy 19-Jan-19 18:16
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 91 EvelynRysdyk 20-Jan-19 00:10
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 94 Poster Boy 20-Jan-19 00:39
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 95 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 06:28
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 92 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 06:19
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 91 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 09:31
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 95 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 10:45
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 92 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 20:42
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 98 Poster Boy 20-Jan-19 17:02
And the intellectual marathon continues, day after day, hour after hour, moment to moment.... 101 Itatw70s 22-Jan-19 02:04
Re: And the intellectual marathon continues, day after day, hour after hour, moment to moment.... 95 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 06:08


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.