You have ‘people’ linked when they are 20+thousand years apart, and say that they are linked. Not by lineage but by inference of artistic styles when there is no connection between them, so artistic styles cannot be considered, no matter how you may present such.
As you are or are not aware, lots of folk are investigating ‘the mysteries’ and where we came from, and where we may be heading to….and there are lots of theories about all of it. You are an estimable theoriser of such things, just like others and myself are...but I certainly can link you back to investigations and observations of ‘old’ things that still stifle the minds of even our modern-day investigators...they think ‘today’ instead of ‘yesterday’. I showed how trigonometry could be easily understood; how observations of the stars could offer up intricate math and geometry; how easy it is to map our planet and its continents...but myth and legend and ‘inference’ deigns a heavenly body as the be-all to end-all.
I don’t ‘sell’ my work. It is what it is...and as of now has some 60 views per day on the site. There is a bit more to add to it, but there is where I got to...bits and pieces are right here on Graham’s site.
So...being published as you are doesn’t do anything for me, or you. It comes down to the basics:
How do you equate folk 20+thousand years apart as being interactive? And not related…
And where do you include a star that takes 90,000 years to send its effulgence to us, and think that effulgence overides our own Earth’s ability to stave off the Sun’s offerings of its own self in such as solar flares?
We rock! How dare you say we don’t