I wound up pulling two of my own follow-ups after you came and went, a few times, without replying to them, although mainly because Ray had suggested to another poster that we remain mindful of trying to keep the focus on your book and article, which I believe mine quite were anyway.
Now, and once again, I see that you have come in and dropped a couple of replies while completely not responding to Ray's new thread which is on point, very well considered and in knowing Ray as I do, a gesture on his part, as in an attempt to steer the focus back to your work.
Is this going to continue to be the way you roll, Jude?
Really? I would have expected more basic courtesy from Britain's one-time "senior business woman" not to mention one with your most impressive academic credentials.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05-Nov-17 17:21 by Poster Boy.
|Jude, what's up?||651||Poster Boy||05-Nov-17 16:34|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||104||carolb||05-Nov-17 17:32|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||91||Poster Boy||05-Nov-17 17:51|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||96||Poster Boy||06-Nov-17 04:04|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||96||judecurrivan||06-Nov-17 11:10|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||134||Poster Boy||06-Nov-17 16:05|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||84||judecurrivan||08-Nov-17 12:48|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||99||Susan Doris||08-Nov-17 13:18|
|Re: Jude, what's up?||170||judecurrivan||09-Nov-17 12:29|