Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Fair enough -- and as you're perhaps not familiar with mine I felt it fair to reveal my position.

I'm happy to engage in discussion and am not offended by blunt questions -- I was in the regular army infantry for eleven years of active duty (where concern over giving offense during verbal exchanges and "conversations" was not common) and subjected to the system at West Point for four years before that (where concern over giving offense during verbal exchanges and "conversations" was also not common).

I would say that phrases such as "give you the benefit of the doubt" could be interpreted as something of a threat, as is the phrase in the above response in which you say "as long as you don't" -- these types of phrases imply the veiled (or thinly veiled) threat of consequences to those you are addressing -- so forgive me if I take umbrage at phrases that are commonly used by those communicating a threat. Perhaps you did not intend your expressions to convey that sense.

I believe that the myths you are calling "agrarian and creation myths" from around the world are actually profound spiritual metaphors of the same exalted character and origin as the "agrarian and creation myths" collected into what we today call the Bible. Myths such as the Osiris myth or the Persephone myth, often interpreted as being primarily about the annual cycle of the seasons and the death and return of the grain and the other growing things, are not primarily about that at all, but rather about our condition as incarnate souls in a world which is apparently material but which is completely at every point interpenetrated by a spiritual realm (which is indeed referred to as the "seed realm" in some of the ancient metaphors) and which (like the sleeping seed beneath the soil) is not seen but full of potential (or "potentiality").

So to answer your questions most directly, I would say that I believe that whoever gave humanity these myths already had a very clear idea of the spiritual truths they wanted to convey when he/she/or they decided to use the "canvas of the stars" to help us to understand them.

Who gave them to humanity I believe is an open question and I do not have the answer -- but I think that the possibilities include a) humans with exalted spiritual understanding, b) supernatural divinity or divinities, or c) other beings (take your pick of where these may have come from -- other dimensions, other planets, this planet, etc). And that's not an exhaustive list, of course.

I do NOT believe that the possible answer includes: a) primitive humans trying to explain the crop cycles b) primitive humans trying to explain the source of thunder or the literal origin of fire, etc. The reason I don't believe those possibilities is that the depth of these metaphors and the exalted spiritual message that is contained in them is unlikely to have been a later addition to "primitive explanations of the natural world" -- it is very unlikely that such "primitive explanations" just happened to, by a happy accident repeated all around the world by the authors of other "primitive explanations," work out nicely to convey exalted spiritual truths when "later less primitive" people came along and decided to import spiritual truths on top of old "primitive natural-world explanations."

I would liken the use of the incredible metaphors of the stars to the use of the vast ocean and the great whales by Herman Melville in Moby Dick.

He was searching for a "canvas" that would be "big enough" to enable him to portray the vast and profound subjects which he wanted to wrestle with in that novel. In the vast depths and the brutal dangers and difficulties of life on a whaling ship and the awesome majesty of the great cetaceans, he found a canvas that was big enough to "cloak in flesh and matter" questions about fate, destiny, providence, mercy, grace, and the mystery of whether we are here for any reason at all or no reason.

I believe that whoever gave humanity the treasure of the ancient myths uses the celestial "ocean" in very much the same way.

I write about that a little in a blog post here (published on a past anniversary of the publication of Moby Dick): http://mathisencorollary.blogspot.com/2014/11/happy-anniversary-to-moby-dick.html

I hope that addresses the questions you've asked, which I believe are both valid and insightful questions.

If not, ask them again! I'll address them eventually if I am able to do so!

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 3001 dwm 02-Mar-16 02:07
Read this second: Adam & Eve -- the story (and a few hints) 716 dwm 02-Mar-16 02:45
Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 700 dwm 02-Mar-16 04:37
And here are some helpful illustrations 620 dwm 03-Mar-16 05:42
and after you've looked at that image you might have a look at this one 628 dwm 03-Mar-16 06:44
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 666 Spiros 03-Mar-16 21:37
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 682 dwm 04-Mar-16 00:49
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 704 Spiros 04-Mar-16 14:18
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 673 dwm 04-Mar-16 15:08
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 521 dwm 04-Mar-16 15:09
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 679 dwm 04-Mar-16 15:23
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 590 Spiros 07-Mar-16 21:24
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 561 dwm 08-Mar-16 07:22
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 540 Spiros 28-Mar-16 18:37
Re: Don't read this one until ready: celestial interpretation 913 dwm 29-Mar-16 04:25
and, "part three," possible messages from this text 655 dwm 02-Mar-16 06:42
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 647 Eddie Larry 02-Mar-16 21:41
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 556 Aine 02-Mar-16 22:19
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 528 Eddie Larry 02-Mar-16 23:43
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 573 Aine 03-Mar-16 15:20
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 512 Aine 03-Mar-16 15:21
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 557 dwm 03-Mar-16 17:24
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 530 dwm 03-Mar-16 00:15
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 630 Aine 03-Mar-16 15:17
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 593 dwm 03-Mar-16 17:17
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 523 Aine 03-Mar-16 17:19
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 546 dwm 04-Mar-16 00:27
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 541 dwm 03-Mar-16 00:06
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 584 drew 03-Mar-16 00:42
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 545 dwm 03-Mar-16 04:12
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 536 drew 03-Mar-16 23:54
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 588 dwm 04-Mar-16 00:25
Pleiades 549 dwm 04-Mar-16 06:51
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 547 drew 04-Mar-16 23:59
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 514 dwm 05-Mar-16 07:19
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 560 drew 07-Mar-16 00:06
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 552 dwm 07-Mar-16 03:52
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 558 drew 07-Mar-16 23:21
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 575 dwm 08-Mar-16 06:38
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 544 drew 09-Mar-16 00:28
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 663 dwm 09-Mar-16 05:43
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 568 drew 11-Mar-16 05:02
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 559 dwm 11-Mar-16 07:59
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 632 drew 15-Mar-16 00:49
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 535 dwm 15-Mar-16 13:54
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 619 drew 15-Mar-16 23:37
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 586 dwm 16-Mar-16 23:14
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 558 drew 17-Mar-16 00:16
Re: and, "part three," possible messages from this text 577 dwm 17-Mar-16 14:03
Side topicking 588 drew 18-Mar-16 00:26
Re: Side topicking 525 dwm 18-Mar-16 18:05
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 592 eli stills 02-Mar-16 22:59
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 639 dwm 03-Mar-16 00:59
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 718 eli stills 03-Mar-16 01:59
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 1077 dwm 03-Mar-16 04:46
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 574 eli stills 03-Mar-16 15:49
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 659 dwm 03-Mar-16 17:07
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 541 Sirius7237 05-Mar-16 03:51
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve Gen 3:1 550 colt 05-Mar-16 18:12
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve Gen 3:1 741 dwm 05-Mar-16 21:19
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve Gen 3:1 561 colt 06-Mar-16 17:45
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve Gen 3:1 659 dwm 06-Mar-16 21:25
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 568 dwm 05-Mar-16 18:33
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 613 Sirius7237 10-Mar-16 00:16
Re: Star Myth demo: Adam & Eve 538 dwm 11-Mar-16 05:22


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.