Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Okay, I had a chance to read over this paper a couple of times and try to make sense of it.

At first, I read over the abstract and tried to get a handle. My first thought was that this guy is a genius or deranged or maybe a combination of both - it really is truly hard to get a handle on what he is talking about:

Abstract

"Current quantum theories of consciousness suggest a configuration space of an entangled ensemble state as global work space for conscious experience. This study will describe a procedure for adjustment of the singlet evolution of a quantum computation to a classical signal input by action potentials. The computational output of an entangled state in a single neuron will be selected in a network environment by "survival of the fittest" coupling with other neurons. Darwinian evolution of this coupling will result in a binding of action potentials to a convoluted orbit of phase-locked oscillations with harmonic, m-adic, or fractal periodicity. Progressive integration of signal inputs will evolve a present memory space independent from the history of construction. Implications for mental processes, e.g., associative memory, creativity, and consciousness will be discussed. A model for generation of quantum coherence in a single neuron will be suggested."

Once I got a little further into the paper and read it over a couple of times it became clear that he was speaking in a language that, as a student of biochemistry, is clearly well-informed, scientifically derived and terminologically accurate even if it is not well articulated to the point of being almost unintelligible to the average reader.

So, all that being said, this is more of a thought experiment than an actual physical experiment that could prove neurons can be stimulated by being uncoupled and at a distance - which is what I was interested in . But, at far as I can tell, it does have interesting implications for the origin of consciousness in the entangled state of a single neuron and the relation of that neuron with the whole neural infrastructure.

An interesting thought hit me while I was reading.....

A single cell can survive in nature on it's own such as an amoeba or paramecium yet a single cell within our bodies is one of billions and billions of cells that work together towards the survival of the organism as a whole. If one accepts that each cell is an entity unto itself, enabled with a form of life and a desire to metabolize and reproduce, yet still is genetically predisposed to function towards the benefit of the organism as a whole, how aware is each single cell of it's own place in a Universe of billions and billions of cells on the scale of an organism?

Okay, my brain hurts - alot.

Good paper though - and I think it is relevant to the topic though I'm not smart enough to figure out how, lol.

. I'll read again tomorrow and see if I can glean any more relevance for the topic we have been discussing. In the meantime.......

Cheers :-)



Post Edited (20-Nov-13 03:54)

"with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back"

~Hunter S. Thompson

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 267 drrayeye 14-Nov-13 15:59
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 163 brucenyc1 14-Nov-13 17:13
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 132 drrayeye 14-Nov-13 17:26
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 174 brucenyc1 14-Nov-13 18:58
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 138 drrayeye 14-Nov-13 21:11
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 163 Aine 14-Nov-13 19:45
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 178 drrayeye 14-Nov-13 21:25
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 182 Aine 15-Nov-13 13:43
Science vs. wissenschaft 253 drrayeye 16-Nov-13 08:15
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 126 Eddie Larry 15-Nov-13 03:06
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 104 drrayeye 15-Nov-13 06:34
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 149 Eddie Larry 16-Nov-13 00:22
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 180 Titus Livius 16-Nov-13 18:02
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 153 drrayeye 17-Nov-13 01:06
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 146 eyeofhorus33 16-Nov-13 18:34
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 153 drrayeye 17-Nov-13 01:11
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 129 cladking 17-Nov-13 03:11
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 180 Sirius7237 18-Nov-13 04:26
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 198 Don Carroll 18-Nov-13 20:11
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 133 Sirius7237 18-Nov-13 22:34
Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 204 Dr. Lew Graham 19-Nov-13 03:44
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 122 Sirius7237 19-Nov-13 07:52
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 157 Aine 19-Nov-13 13:54
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 171 carolb 19-Nov-13 14:17
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 197 Aine 19-Nov-13 14:48
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 173 JonnyMcA 19-Nov-13 15:11
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 167 Sirius7237 19-Nov-13 16:54
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 135 Aine 19-Nov-13 17:37
Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 117 Sirius7237 20-Nov-13 03:15
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 178 Aine 20-Nov-13 18:28
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 159 Don Carroll 20-Nov-13 21:25
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 155 Sirfiroth 21-Nov-13 00:58
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 176 Don Carroll 22-Nov-13 22:33
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 183 cladking 23-Nov-13 01:11
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 146 Don Carroll 23-Nov-13 01:46
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 109 Sirius7237 21-Nov-13 18:50
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 232 Don Carroll 23-Nov-13 00:15
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 194 Sirius7237 21-Nov-13 05:48
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 164 Aine 22-Nov-13 14:20
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 162 Sirius7237 22-Nov-13 18:56
Re: Quantum evolution of entangled particles in neural nets and consciousness! 161 Aine 03-Dec-13 14:15
Great Australian News Link! 162 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Dec-13 07:03
Re: Great Australian News Link! 145 Aine 04-Dec-13 12:38
Re: Great Australian News Link! 123 Sirius7237 04-Dec-13 20:45
Re: Great Australian News Link! 158 Aine 05-Dec-13 12:45
Re: Great Australian News Link! 152 Sirius7237 05-Dec-13 17:53
Re: Great Australian News Link! 158 Aine 06-Dec-13 15:12
A "Mechanism"? 186 Dr. Lew Graham 04-Dec-13 22:01
Re: A "Mechanism"? 158 Aine 05-Dec-13 12:46
Re: Separated electron pairs remain "connected" with respect to opposite polarity 156 D-Archer 24-Nov-13 10:49
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 169 D-Archer 24-Nov-13 10:44
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 172 Eddie Larry 24-Nov-13 15:03
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 132 cladking 24-Nov-13 16:13
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 175 laughin 08-Dec-13 16:34
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 142 David Campbell 09-Dec-13 22:15
Re: Can one be both a scientist and a spiritualist? 145 cladking 10-Dec-13 03:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.