Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Richard Fusniak wrote:

> Aine wrote:
>
> > Richard Fusniak wrote:
> >
> > > Another piece or New Age nonsense.
> > >
> > > The human brain may internally generate low frequencies
> but
> > > that they vary in frequency from person to person shows
> that
> > > they are not associated, influenced or are dependent on
> any
> > > external Schumann frequencies.
> > >
> > > Also, NASA has never incorporated "Schumann resonators" on
> > the
> > > Shuttle.
> > >
> > > It's also nonsense that the towers in Ireland (a few tens
> of
> > > meters in height) can act as dielectric (non-metallic)
> > antennae
> > > and amplifiers for Schumann Waves. They would be incapable
> of
> > > picking up such weak signals since a full wavelength at
> 7.8
> > Hz
> > > is approximately 40Km in length.
> > >
> > >
> > > Fuzzy
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Post Edited (22-Sep-13 14:27)
> >
> > What the heck is a Schumann resonator?
>
>
> The Schumann resonance is a term to describe the space between
> the earth and the ionosphere. It does nothing in itself until
> stimulated by things like lightning whereupon electromagnetic
> detectors see a peak (or resonance) in responses coinciding
> with very low frequencies.
>
> Thunderbird claimed generators of such low frequencies were
> used on the Space Shuttle but this is not so. The Space Shuttle
> has however been used as a platform for lightning studies and
> this may be the cause of his confusion. Perhaps he might like
> to confirm or deny this.
> [en.wikipedia.org]
>
> Fuzzy
>

>
> Post Edited (22-Sep-13 19:03)

Thanks for the explanation, Fuzzy. :))

Slightly OT, but what is the definition of "very low frequency"? How low are we talking here?



In the spring, at the end of the day, you should smell like earth. ~ Margaret Atwood

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Stones as energy devices 7647 MichaelTellinger 17-Sep-13 09:59
Re: Stones as energy devices 887 Aine 17-Sep-13 15:44
Re: Stones as energy devices 748 Sirius7237 17-Sep-13 17:47
Re: Stones as energy devices 830 MichaelTellinger 21-Sep-13 09:55
Re: Stones as energy devices 684 Richard Fusniak 21-Sep-13 10:14
Re: Schumann Waves 725 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 04:05
Re: Schumann Waves 570 loveritas 22-Sep-13 12:17
Re: Schumann Waves 540 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 18:43
Re: Schumann Waves 583 loveritas 24-Sep-13 12:20
Re: Sacred Feminine 526 Thunderbird 24-Sep-13 19:56
Re: Sacred Feminine 537 loveritas 24-Sep-13 21:38
Re: The path now is a different one forever. 466 Thunderbird 26-Sep-13 03:39
Re: The path now is a different one forever. 484 loveritas 26-Sep-13 12:02
New age nonsense 637 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 14:23
Re: New age nonsense 549 Aine 22-Sep-13 18:48
Re: New age nonsense 526 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 19:02
Re: New age nonsense 494 carolb 22-Sep-13 20:11
Re: New age nonsense 466 Aine 23-Sep-13 13:22
Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 541 Richard Fusniak 23-Sep-13 14:38
Re: Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 510 Aine 23-Sep-13 14:44
Re: Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 541 Bobajot 25-Sep-13 01:18
Re: Schumann Waves 491 carolb 22-Sep-13 15:28
Re: Schumann Waves 494 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 17:49
Re: Schumann Waves 494 carolb 22-Sep-13 18:12
Science, fact and fiction. 523 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 18:26
Re: Schumann Waves 468 Bobajot 28-Sep-13 02:44
Re: Stones as energy devices 525 MJT 18-Sep-13 01:45
Re: Stones as energy devices 521 PB Bytes 18-Sep-13 02:01
Re: Stones as energy devices 593 David Campbell 18-Sep-13 03:42
Re: Stones as energy devices 481 PB Bytes 18-Sep-13 09:24
Re: Stones as energy devices 500 Aine 18-Sep-13 13:08
Re: Stones as energy devices 488 David Campbell 18-Sep-13 14:36
Re: Stones as energy devices 466 Aine 23-Sep-13 14:59
Tweaking one's interior sense 547 Dr. Lew Graham 19-Sep-13 22:12
Re: Stones as energy devices 524 michael seabrook 18-Sep-13 19:51
SILICA is the answer 700 MichaelTellinger 23-Sep-13 09:32
Your belief system is not supported by real science 556 Richard Fusniak 23-Sep-13 10:15
Re: SILICA is the answer 580 Archae Solenhofen 23-Sep-13 15:34
Re: SILICA is the answer 557 michael seabrook 25-Sep-13 10:00
Re: Stones as energy devices 642 Cjones1 20-Mar-19 05:27


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.