Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Richard Fusniak wrote:

> Aine wrote:
>
> > Richard Fusniak wrote:
> >
> > > Another piece or New Age nonsense.
> > >
> > > The human brain may internally generate low frequencies
> but
> > > that they vary in frequency from person to person shows
> that
> > > they are not associated, influenced or are dependent on
> any
> > > external Schumann frequencies.
> > >
> > > Also, NASA has never incorporated "Schumann resonators" on
> > the
> > > Shuttle.
> > >
> > > It's also nonsense that the towers in Ireland (a few tens
> of
> > > meters in height) can act as dielectric (non-metallic)
> > antennae
> > > and amplifiers for Schumann Waves. They would be incapable
> of
> > > picking up such weak signals since a full wavelength at
> 7.8
> > Hz
> > > is approximately 40Km in length.
> > >
> > >
> > > Fuzzy
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Post Edited (22-Sep-13 14:27)
> >
> > What the heck is a Schumann resonator?
>
>
> The Schumann resonance is a term to describe the space between
> the earth and the ionosphere. It does nothing in itself until
> stimulated by things like lightning whereupon electromagnetic
> detectors see a peak (or resonance) in responses coinciding
> with very low frequencies.
>
> Thunderbird claimed generators of such low frequencies were
> used on the Space Shuttle but this is not so. The Space Shuttle
> has however been used as a platform for lightning studies and
> this may be the cause of his confusion. Perhaps he might like
> to confirm or deny this.
> [en.wikipedia.org]
>
> Fuzzy
>

>
> Post Edited (22-Sep-13 19:03)

Thanks for the explanation, Fuzzy. :))

Slightly OT, but what is the definition of "very low frequency"? How low are we talking here?



Stupidity is knowing the truth, seeing the truth but still believing the lies. And that is more infectious than any other disease. ~ Richard Feynman

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Stones as energy devices 8064 MichaelTellinger 17-Sep-13 09:59
Re: Stones as energy devices 1035 Aine 17-Sep-13 15:44
Re: Stones as energy devices 893 Sirius7237 17-Sep-13 17:47
Re: Stones as energy devices 975 MichaelTellinger 21-Sep-13 09:55
Re: Stones as energy devices 819 Richard Fusniak 21-Sep-13 10:14
Re: Schumann Waves 874 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 04:05
Re: Schumann Waves 703 loveritas 22-Sep-13 12:17
Re: Schumann Waves 677 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 18:43
Re: Schumann Waves 719 loveritas 24-Sep-13 12:20
Re: Sacred Feminine 668 Thunderbird 24-Sep-13 19:56
Re: Sacred Feminine 676 loveritas 24-Sep-13 21:38
Re: The path now is a different one forever. 608 Thunderbird 26-Sep-13 03:39
Re: The path now is a different one forever. 623 loveritas 26-Sep-13 12:02
New age nonsense 780 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 14:23
Re: New age nonsense 680 Aine 22-Sep-13 18:48
Re: New age nonsense 658 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 19:02
Re: New age nonsense 632 carolb 22-Sep-13 20:11
Re: New age nonsense 603 Aine 23-Sep-13 13:22
Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 672 Richard Fusniak 23-Sep-13 14:38
Re: Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 652 Aine 23-Sep-13 14:44
Re: Frequency range of the elctromagnetic spectrum 684 Bobajot 25-Sep-13 01:18
Re: Schumann Waves 623 carolb 22-Sep-13 15:28
Re: Schumann Waves 623 Thunderbird 22-Sep-13 17:49
Re: Schumann Waves 634 carolb 22-Sep-13 18:12
Science, fact and fiction. 671 Richard Fusniak 22-Sep-13 18:26
Re: Schumann Waves 602 Bobajot 28-Sep-13 02:44
Re: Stones as energy devices 663 MJT 18-Sep-13 01:45
Re: Stones as energy devices 663 PB Bytes 18-Sep-13 02:01
Re: Stones as energy devices 737 David Campbell 18-Sep-13 03:42
Re: Stones as energy devices 619 PB Bytes 18-Sep-13 09:24
Re: Stones as energy devices 631 Aine 18-Sep-13 13:08
Re: Stones as energy devices 629 David Campbell 18-Sep-13 14:36
Re: Stones as energy devices 602 Aine 23-Sep-13 14:59
Tweaking one's interior sense 688 Dr. Lew Graham 19-Sep-13 22:12
Re: Stones as energy devices 661 michael seabrook 18-Sep-13 19:51
SILICA is the answer 850 MichaelTellinger 23-Sep-13 09:32
Your belief system is not supported by real science 693 Richard Fusniak 23-Sep-13 10:15
Re: SILICA is the answer 720 Archae Solenhofen 23-Sep-13 15:34
Re: SILICA is the answer 690 michael seabrook 25-Sep-13 10:00
Re: Stones as energy devices 826 Cjones1 20-Mar-19 05:27


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.