> I could turn around everything you wrote in your above two
> paragraphs to fit my opinion of your views and in deed that is
> what I would do because at the end of the day, your views are
> only your opinions too! If you want to run away from the
> discussion with your fantasies and your amnesia, so we'll just
> have to agree to disagree! ;)
Yes, it is my opinions versus your opinions except for one very important point that you constantly fail to address. I can get support for my opinions from historians, anthropologists etc who have no familiarity with astrology. I am not talking about one historian, I am talking many historians that will support the change of ages in the 8th century BC and the around the 15th century AD.
In the end if the astrological ages have any validity whatsoever they must have some correlation to historical events. If historians cannot detect these historical events than who can? Historians can detect changes in the 8th century BC and 15th century AD and another 2150 years before that again! There is no support that the Pisces age began at the birth of Jesus no matter how many Christologists jump up and down in estatic frenzy that Jesus commenced the Pisces age.
You do not tender support from people who have reputations for their historical skills, therefore your opinions are unsupported. So do my opinions that have support from historians etc only have the same validity as your opinions that have no support? I don't think so.
You should not hide the fact that you are a Christologist. You should promote yourself as such so that other Christologists can congregate to you and the rest of us don't have to waste our times with mere opinions based on your personal belief system that has no correspondence in rationality or support from people that look at history rationally. I am sure you can find numerous like minded souls. This would be the honest way to approach the situation from your side.
If you had demonstrated a serious interest in your research you would not be sprayng me with your opinions, you would be showing me support from reputable sources associated with history.