> Of course you can’t add, bless your heart. Of
> course...here, let me help you.
> 1238 views at 10:04 am
> 1245 views 14 hours later when I made my last
> 7 people coming in
> You twice and me once equals 3, so 4 other people
> came in in 14 hours.
> 1273 total views at 8 1/2 hours later, after my
> last post
> 28 viewers came in
> You once and me once and 26 other viewers
> Viewers of your posts: 107
> of mine: 22
> minus ourselves viewing: 2x3 + 2x2 = 10
> 129 – 10 = 119
> Bear with me now...this is where it gets really
> Of the 35 viewers who came in total, we were 2 of
> them and we did it 5 times in total to read what
> the other wrote. Which means possibly 30 came in
> and read the initial post, but the numbers say 28.
> Of those, minus you, 13 made it to my 10:04 post
> and 7 to my last post...13 out of 30 then 7 out of
> 30 means 6 didn’t go past my second last post,
> which means 17 or 15 didn’t go past the initial
> post of this topic.
> Let’s just say that for curiosity and because
> some numbers did go up, you kept jumping back in
> here to see if I had responded, so you have added
> your own views to this topic...so how about we
> take you out of the equation again for...hmm...4
> 26 or 24 unique viewers...half of which saw my
> second last post and half of those my last post.
> Let’s stick with 26 unique viewers, and you have
> them viewing your largest post 54 times...well, I
> read it twice, so 52 times. The same with your
> other posts...minus me once or twice each.
> If half the people coming in are getting to my
> second last post, and half again getting to my
> last post, then odds are the same is happening to
> your posts...
> ...do you see something wrong with this picture,
> 29 ( - me) – 13 = you
> 54 ( - me) – 7 = you
> 24 (- me) – 4 = you
> Do you like the numbers now, Martin?
> And I bet that if anyone wants to go and check any
> of your posts that you nicely provided, they would
> see something similar happening to your very own
> posts, where folk who get 4 views are next to you
> getting 30 views...and folk who are getting 15
> views are next to you getting 50 views...and all
> kinds of strange things appear where your posts
> appear to be so much more popular compared to the
> number of people actually visiting.
> That seems like a head full of fun, wouldn’t you
> say Martin Stower?
> MSHFOF ;)
Apart from the lie in the subject line, what do we find here?