Last time we spoke about this subject you clearly hadn't read the report and continued to behave with exactly the same obfuscation and avoidance you are displaying here.
As far as I'm concerned your arguments always devolve to 'the authorities can't be wrong'. You refuse to address any evidence (or lack of) that does not support this view.
You can hardly claim some twisted victory under the circumstances.
At least not outside your imagination.
Have you read the NIST report on the World Trade Center collapse?