Gunpowder, Treason & Plot :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
This is the board for you if you wish to discuss or explore conspiracies of any kind, historical or current. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.cmog.org]
> er
>
> excerpt:
>
> The space shuttle has triple paned,
> optical-quality windows. Thirty-seven window panes
> in eleven different sizes and shapes are produced
> for each Orbiter. The fused silica outer panes of
> the forward windshields are designed to withstand
> high atmosphere reentry temperatures. The inner,
> tempered alumino-silicate glass pane is called the
> pressure pane. It is designed for maximum strength
> to withstand the shuttle's cabin pressure in the
> vacuum of space. The thick fused silica middle
> pane is capable of withstanding both the reentry
> temperature and the cabin pressure
>
> Hi Tbird,
>
> Given the techno capabilities of the 60's ie:
> Blackbird or any other fighter...
>
> look at the picture in the link above and tell me
> why we shouldn't expect the lunacy lander to have
> something similar...anything similar?
>
> I'll be honest and openly state that I'm amazed,
> and disturbed, by the level of cognitive
> dissonance on display here. The lander looks and
> feels as though it was a hastily constructed back
> yard project and yet it is defended by the
> believers...where is the common sense? As a btw,
> as you know, there are probably an easy 40+ other
> reasons to question but on this one issue alone,
> I'm told to disregard the shoddy construction
> because it's just not necessary on a trip to the
> moon. Placing aside the VA belts and photography
> stuff for the moment, precision is out the window
> on a project with billions of dollars involved?
>
> Super true that the populace is easily fooled by
> the big lie. Gov't told me they went - and was on
> tv - so of course it happened. pfft. laughable.
>
> Weird to recognize that some just can't overcome
> false beliefs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The space shuttle has triple paned,
> optical-quality windows. Thirty-seven window panes
> in eleven different sizes and shapes are produced
> for each Orbiter. The fused silica outer panes of
> the forward windshields are designed to withstand
> high atmosphere reentry temperatures. The inner,
> tempered alumino-silicate glass pane is called the
> pressure pane. It is designed for maximum strength
> to withstand the shuttle's cabin pressure in the
> vacuum of space. The thick fused silica middle
> pane is capable of withstanding both the reentry
> temperature and the cabin pressure


Hello Racho; you wrote: “…look at the picture in the link above and tell me why we shouldn't expect the lunacy lander to have something similar...anything similar?"





From the Apollo News Reference, Lunar Module, Quick Reference Data sheet: ”The two triangular windows in the front face assembly each have approximately 2 square feet of viewing area…The docking window above the Commander’s flight station has approximately 80 square inches of viewing area…All three windows consist of two separated panes, vented to space. The outer pane is of low-strength, annealed material that inhibits micrometeoroid penetration…”

“Because landers were designed to be used only in spacenot to withstand re-entry into earth’s atmosphere—engineers had no need to factor atmospheric friction into their design. Thus, says NASM curator Allan Needell, “the lunar module looks flimsy and gangly—it’s a very pure design built for a very specific mission.”

Source: SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE



Dr. Troglodyte


“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?“ - Decimus Junius Juvenalis
Η άγνοια είναι η μητέρα του μύθου και του μυστηρίου.


“Numero, Pondere et Mensura“


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
To the moon and back... 3962 Racho 04-Jan-18 08:09
Re: To the moon and back... 548 Thunderbird 06-Jan-18 18:10
Grissom and the horrible 'accident' 533 Racho 07-Jan-18 08:08
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 464 molder 17-Jan-18 12:20
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 442 Racho 17-Jan-18 20:31
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 439 molder 18-Jan-18 11:26
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 445 Racho 18-Jan-18 17:52
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 10 451 molder 19-Jan-18 11:30
Making up ones mind... 425 Racho 21-Jan-18 21:45
Re: Making up ones mind... 518 molder 21-Jan-18 22:53
Re: Making up ones mind... 398 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 17:19
Re: To the moon and back... 419 Race Jackson 07-Mar-18 18:51
Re: To the moon and back... 390 Racho 07-Mar-18 20:04
Re: To the moon and back... 406 carolb 07-Mar-18 20:29
Re: To the moon and back... 405 Race Jackson 08-Mar-18 15:22
Re: To the moon and back... 389 carolb 08-Mar-18 15:38
Re: No Man placed a reflector on the Moon 412 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 01:42
Re: No Man placed a reflector on the Moon 418 carolb 08-Mar-18 01:58
At least admit the truth of the matter Carol 435 Racho 08-Mar-18 03:22
I do hope for a reply...either from you or others re: Van Allen belt 435 Racho 08-Mar-18 04:23
Re: Size matters 395 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 17:44
Re: To the moon and back... 386 Race Jackson 08-Mar-18 20:57
Re: Apollo 11 to the Moon.....Nope.....not happening : ) 420 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 21:46
Re: To the moon and back... 402 ldennyjr 28-Mar-18 21:59
cardboard airlock doors... 379 Racho 29-Mar-18 01:20
Re: To the moon and back... 390 Race Jackson 29-Mar-18 21:59
Direct question then (not that I haven't posed any before ...) 394 Racho 30-Mar-18 06:49
Re: Direct question then (not that I haven't posed any before ...) 391 ldennyjr 30-Mar-18 21:03
Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 387 Racho 01-Apr-18 01:01
Re: NASA is Occult/FreeMasonic deception and Propoganda 380 Thunderbird 02-Apr-18 18:12
Re: NASA is Occult/FreeMasonic deception and Propoganda 356 Race Jackson 03-Apr-18 16:09
Windows matter... 430 Racho 05-Apr-18 01:00
Re: Windows matter... 482 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Apr-18 21:45
Re: Windows matter... 387 ldennyjr 06-Apr-18 02:01
Re: lol!.....the Smithsonian magazine 414 Thunderbird 08-Apr-18 00:52
Re: Eyes wide open... 420 Thunderbird 08-Apr-18 01:14
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 359 Race Jackson 03-Apr-18 16:15
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 357 ldennyjr 03-Apr-18 17:17
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 356 Racho 03-Apr-18 18:33
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 363 ldennyjr 03-Apr-18 20:17
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 371 Racho 03-Apr-18 21:03
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 368 ldennyjr 04-Apr-18 00:47
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 410 carolb 04-Apr-18 01:09
As a heavy machinist... 386 Racho 04-Apr-18 06:35
Re: As a heavy machinist... 359 ldennyjr 04-Apr-18 22:38
So what? 365 Racho 04-Apr-18 23:28
Re: So what? 374 ldennyjr 05-Apr-18 13:40
Re: So what? 744 ldennyjr 11-Apr-18 13:37
Re: As a heavy machinist... 390 carolb 05-Apr-18 15:04
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 369 WhoWeird 03-Apr-18 21:37
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 355 Racho 03-Apr-18 21:39
Re: To the moon and back... 404 Race Jackson 30-Mar-18 16:20
Re: To the moon and back... 370 Race Jackson 04-Apr-18 21:52
Re: To the moon and back... 352 ldennyjr 06-Apr-18 17:28
Re: To the moon and back... 411 carolb 06-Apr-18 19:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.