Gunpowder, Treason & Plot :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
This is the board for you if you wish to discuss or explore conspiracies of any kind, historical or current. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.cmog.org]
> er
>
> excerpt:
>
> The space shuttle has triple paned,
> optical-quality windows. Thirty-seven window panes
> in eleven different sizes and shapes are produced
> for each Orbiter. The fused silica outer panes of
> the forward windshields are designed to withstand
> high atmosphere reentry temperatures. The inner,
> tempered alumino-silicate glass pane is called the
> pressure pane. It is designed for maximum strength
> to withstand the shuttle's cabin pressure in the
> vacuum of space. The thick fused silica middle
> pane is capable of withstanding both the reentry
> temperature and the cabin pressure
>
> Hi Tbird,
>
> Given the techno capabilities of the 60's ie:
> Blackbird or any other fighter...
>
> look at the picture in the link above and tell me
> why we shouldn't expect the lunacy lander to have
> something similar...anything similar?
>
> I'll be honest and openly state that I'm amazed,
> and disturbed, by the level of cognitive
> dissonance on display here. The lander looks and
> feels as though it was a hastily constructed back
> yard project and yet it is defended by the
> believers...where is the common sense? As a btw,
> as you know, there are probably an easy 40+ other
> reasons to question but on this one issue alone,
> I'm told to disregard the shoddy construction
> because it's just not necessary on a trip to the
> moon. Placing aside the VA belts and photography
> stuff for the moment, precision is out the window
> on a project with billions of dollars involved?
>
> Super true that the populace is easily fooled by
> the big lie. Gov't told me they went - and was on
> tv - so of course it happened. pfft. laughable.
>
> Weird to recognize that some just can't overcome
> false beliefs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The space shuttle has triple paned,
> optical-quality windows. Thirty-seven window panes
> in eleven different sizes and shapes are produced
> for each Orbiter. The fused silica outer panes of
> the forward windshields are designed to withstand
> high atmosphere reentry temperatures. The inner,
> tempered alumino-silicate glass pane is called the
> pressure pane. It is designed for maximum strength
> to withstand the shuttle's cabin pressure in the
> vacuum of space. The thick fused silica middle
> pane is capable of withstanding both the reentry
> temperature and the cabin pressure


Hello Racho; you wrote: “…look at the picture in the link above and tell me why we shouldn't expect the lunacy lander to have something similar...anything similar?"





From the Apollo News Reference, Lunar Module, Quick Reference Data sheet: ”The two triangular windows in the front face assembly each have approximately 2 square feet of viewing area…The docking window above the Commander’s flight station has approximately 80 square inches of viewing area…All three windows consist of two separated panes, vented to space. The outer pane is of low-strength, annealed material that inhibits micrometeoroid penetration…”

“Because landers were designed to be used only in spacenot to withstand re-entry into earth’s atmosphere—engineers had no need to factor atmospheric friction into their design. Thus, says NASM curator Allan Needell, “the lunar module looks flimsy and gangly—it’s a very pure design built for a very specific mission.”

Source: SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE



Dr. Troglodyte


“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?“ - Decimus Junius Juvenalis
Η άγνοια είναι η μητέρα του μύθου και του μυστηρίου.


“Numero, Pondere et Mensura“


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
To the moon and back... 3762 Racho 04-Jan-18 08:09
Re: To the moon and back... 500 Thunderbird 06-Jan-18 18:10
Grissom and the horrible 'accident' 473 Racho 07-Jan-18 08:08
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 411 molder 17-Jan-18 12:20
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 389 Racho 17-Jan-18 20:31
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 382 molder 18-Jan-18 11:26
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 8 383 Racho 18-Jan-18 17:52
Re: They went around the Moon Apollo 10 400 molder 19-Jan-18 11:30
Making up ones mind... 371 Racho 21-Jan-18 21:45
Re: Making up ones mind... 465 molder 21-Jan-18 22:53
Re: Making up ones mind... 338 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 17:19
Re: To the moon and back... 354 Race Jackson 07-Mar-18 18:51
Re: To the moon and back... 341 Racho 07-Mar-18 20:04
Re: To the moon and back... 348 carolb 07-Mar-18 20:29
Re: To the moon and back... 340 Race Jackson 08-Mar-18 15:22
Re: To the moon and back... 337 carolb 08-Mar-18 15:38
Re: No Man placed a reflector on the Moon 352 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 01:42
Re: No Man placed a reflector on the Moon 355 carolb 08-Mar-18 01:58
At least admit the truth of the matter Carol 376 Racho 08-Mar-18 03:22
I do hope for a reply...either from you or others re: Van Allen belt 375 Racho 08-Mar-18 04:23
Re: Size matters 333 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 17:44
Re: To the moon and back... 325 Race Jackson 08-Mar-18 20:57
Re: Apollo 11 to the Moon.....Nope.....not happening : ) 368 Thunderbird 08-Mar-18 21:46
Re: To the moon and back... 335 ldennyjr 28-Mar-18 21:59
cardboard airlock doors... 328 Racho 29-Mar-18 01:20
Re: To the moon and back... 327 Race Jackson 29-Mar-18 21:59
Direct question then (not that I haven't posed any before ...) 337 Racho 30-Mar-18 06:49
Re: Direct question then (not that I haven't posed any before ...) 333 ldennyjr 30-Mar-18 21:03
Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 328 Racho 01-Apr-18 01:01
Re: NASA is Occult/FreeMasonic deception and Propoganda 325 Thunderbird 02-Apr-18 18:12
Re: NASA is Occult/FreeMasonic deception and Propoganda 293 Race Jackson 03-Apr-18 16:09
Windows matter... 370 Racho 05-Apr-18 01:00
Re: Windows matter... 404 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Apr-18 21:45
Re: Windows matter... 329 ldennyjr 06-Apr-18 02:01
Re: lol!.....the Smithsonian magazine 357 Thunderbird 08-Apr-18 00:52
Re: Eyes wide open... 363 Thunderbird 08-Apr-18 01:14
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 300 Race Jackson 03-Apr-18 16:15
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 303 ldennyjr 03-Apr-18 17:17
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 303 Racho 03-Apr-18 18:33
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 302 ldennyjr 03-Apr-18 20:17
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 317 Racho 03-Apr-18 21:03
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 311 ldennyjr 04-Apr-18 00:47
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 345 carolb 04-Apr-18 01:09
As a heavy machinist... 330 Racho 04-Apr-18 06:35
Re: As a heavy machinist... 301 ldennyjr 04-Apr-18 22:38
So what? 308 Racho 04-Apr-18 23:28
Re: So what? 315 ldennyjr 05-Apr-18 13:40
Re: So what? 627 ldennyjr 11-Apr-18 13:37
Re: As a heavy machinist... 338 carolb 05-Apr-18 15:04
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 311 WhoWeird 03-Apr-18 21:37
Re: Simple science question? Does AC even work in the vaccum of space...? 304 Racho 03-Apr-18 21:39
Re: To the moon and back... 333 Race Jackson 30-Mar-18 16:20
Re: To the moon and back... 309 Race Jackson 04-Apr-18 21:52
Re: To the moon and back... 301 ldennyjr 06-Apr-18 17:28
Re: To the moon and back... 354 carolb 06-Apr-18 19:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.