For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm.
is that you're way of saying that you agree with all my other points. Surely you realise that my statement that i wouldn't ridicule sitchin was satire. It also implies that you yourself agree with Sitchin's statements as apparently it's ok for other posters to call von daniken 100% crackpot, looney toons, nutter but not ok for me to express my opinion that in my eyes he is a looney. The original question which was aimed expressly at me was "What have you researched and written on that can counter what Mr. Stitchen is saying? Do you know it's BS, or do you simply "think" it's BS?" Well in my opinion and experience the majority of mr Sitchin's work is B.S. which in my vernacular means Bad Science. We're he to actually post on the forum (and i have e mailed him several times before now about various points he has raised, but still no answer) i could quite happily prove most of his claims fraudulent, as i believe i have gone some ways to doing already
ref a planet with a 3600 year orbit that has survived a crash into earth and comes back to drop gods off occaisonally to fight in wars. What conclusion have you come to about his planet x idea.
Looney or non looney idea.
dictionary.com definition of looney - Extremely foolish or silly.
If the shoe fits