> What are the possibilities that could explain this incident.
> 1. Its a hoax! If so how was the hoax created & by whom.
It is very difficult to alter infrared photography, but lets suppose someone has. The aircraft equipment being used is very sophisticated. Lets say you are in charge of the aircraft (under your command), do you think the technology in your aircraft would be built in such a way that the pilots could just plop in their own homemade movie? No way. These guys are tracking drug dealers and they are going to need those tapes as evidence and those tapes must be shown to have been recorded with the utmost validity. In other words, the pilots couldn't have been in on it. This would have to have been a hoax perpetuated by the Mexican Government. Why?
> 2. Faulty equipment.
I've read so many articles about it now so I cannot remember which one, but the Mexican AF performed tests on the equipment after the incident. If it was faulty then, it isn't faulty now.
> 3. The pictures are genuine but what do they show?
Several sources of heat and mass moving with appearant intelligent motives. One occasion they 'dissappeared' (from in front of them)then 'reappeared' (behind them). The instruments did not detect acceleration from the objects prior to 'disappearing'. One would expect a jump from the heat source. Not so.
> 3.1. A 'cloaked' vehicle hidden from human sight but still
> emitting a light source signature & which still can be picked
> up by radar. Even stealth technology does better than this.
> Would it not be logical that a technology that can hide from
> human sight should also be capable hiding from radar & from
> infra red technology.
My understanding is that their was no light source...
> 3.2 A natural phenomena. I am unaware of any natural
> phenomena (anybody got any suggestions) that could cause
> this. But, perhaps the phenomena relates to an an discovered
> form of life.
An undiscovered form of life is very possible. Extraterrestial life is only one possability.
> 3.3 Perhaps the phenomena relates to some time distortion?
> 3.4 Perhaps the phenomena relates to some unknown law of
> 3.5 Perhaps the phenomena relates to a known law of physics?
> 4. Any other possibilities?
None that are considered rational.
This was fun.