> mm.. you did not really read my rebuttal it
> Let us agree to disagree.
> //END// for real this time ;-)
Yes, I did read it. It was word salad, and addressed none of the schoolboy errors you made. You need to learn some science before you start trying to write about it. I provided actual science, you have nothing more than unscientific word salad. You simply do not have clue one about any of the relevant science. Almost certainly due to never having studied it. You cannot address your schoolboy error about the temperature and size of Sirius B, for instance. If it were Sun sized, and 25 000 K, what would be its apparent magnitude? Hint - slightly brighter in our skies than Venus! Try it yourself;
That will save you having to do the maths of which I am certain you are not capable. The figures of relevance that you need to input, are;
Solar radius = 700 000 km.
Temperature = 25 000 K.
Distance = 8 ly.
See the results? Apparent magnitude = ~ -4.7! Like I said, slightly brighter than Venus at its very brightest of - 4.5. What do we actually see? Zilch. It is outshone by Sirius A at magnitude -1.46!
You cannot address the ridiculous claim of stars forming in z-pinches, and have been totally unable to deal with the Doppler data that show your examples to be trivially wrong.
You cannot explain the idiotic claim that 25 000 K is an electron temperature, or your false claims of how white dwarves are formed in mainstream (i.e. real) science.
I could go on, but there is little point. You have no grasp of the relevant science, but will continue to use your ignorance of such things to write more totally idiotic nonsense outside the scientific literature. It matters not - nobody is taking any notice. It is just posing, for whatever reason.
There is nothing to agree to disagree on. You are 100% wrong, as shown. You may want to avail yourself of the following;