Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Daniel,
Maybe the best explanation is simply frustration. There are many obvious problems with current archaeological theory and practice which stem from errors dating back to the sciences infancy in North America and maybe slightly earlier in Europe. There is no place in theoretical science for mere speculation such as that which archaeology has long been subject to. When mere speculation replaces gainable understanding and unchecked becomes a large part of long-accepted theory it becomes more than an issue. Eventually, it renders the science ineffective. Not that a course correction would be so difficult but compounding issue number two is a hierarchy of academia which has no place in science refuses to examine any possibility of mistakes having ever been made by their predecessors. If you are familiar with Ales Hrdlicka and the travesty he perpetrated on the science by throwing all of humanity under the ignorance bus for nothing more than his own ego you would likely find these same practices being perpetrated to this very day.
Study the picture I have linked closely. If an archaeologist told you it was indeed an artifact would you take issue with that assessment? If an archaeologist told you it was nothing more than a naturally occurring rock, would you take issue with that assessment? I can tell you as an avocational archaeologist, which I never intended to be, that it is most definitely without a shred of doubt an artifact. You would play hell finding a professional archaeologist in North America who would concur with that assessment. The difference being that I have spent countless hours studying similar artifacts to the point that I am completely familiar with the patination and erosion processes of many different types of stone as well as the individual functionalities uses and wear patterns associated with most of the artifacts I collect. A process which includes the creation of lithic reproductions for testing by applying them to the exact same tasks they were designed for with identical wear patterns being produced. The professional archaeologist would complacently dismiss it without so much as picking it up to examine it because it lacks conchoidal fracture as well as fear of ridicule he would be subject to by his colleagues for investigating a stone with a facial likeness on it. I have seen only one archaeologist take enough note of one of the most perfectly etched faces on a stone I have ever seen, that he actually posted a pic on an archaeological forum site. The words which accompanied the pic: " If I didn't know any better". It received the expected eye roll responses from his colleagues. My question: Where does this Knowledge come from and what scientific substance supports it? I could expand on many more flawed theories and lack of understanding but I'll rest my case here for now. Opinion?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Despite the Obvious 1942 KsFisher 03-Aug-18 08:03
Re: Despite the Obvious 299 D-Archer 03-Aug-18 10:31
Re: Despite the Obvious 300 KsFisher 03-Aug-18 15:15
Despite the Irony 302 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Aug-18 16:04
Re: Despite the Irony 293 KsFisher 03-Aug-18 18:21
Re: Despite the Irony 314 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Aug-18 21:35
Re: Despite the Irony 275 KsFisher 04-Aug-18 10:37
Mod Note > Post Reauthorized 295 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Aug-18 17:29
Re: Despite the Irony 279 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Aug-18 18:08
Re: Despite the Irony 269 KsFisher 05-Aug-18 17:54
Re: Despite the Obvious 275 Eddie Larry 03-Aug-18 15:35
Re: Despite the Obvious 276 KsFisher 03-Aug-18 18:34
Paradigm Paralysis 527 KsFisher 13-Aug-18 21:38
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 319 Steve Clayton 13-Aug-18 22:30
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 304 KsFisher 13-Aug-18 23:06
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 271 Steve Clayton 14-Aug-18 01:09
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 299 KsFisher 14-Aug-18 01:23
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 291 cladking 14-Aug-18 01:41
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 288 KsFisher 14-Aug-18 04:07
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 308 Thunderbird 14-Aug-18 20:13
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 279 Steve Clayton 14-Aug-18 03:26
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 279 KsFisher 14-Aug-18 03:56
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 297 Corpuscles 14-Aug-18 04:30
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 308 Audrey 14-Aug-18 05:32
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 296 Corpuscles 14-Aug-18 05:55
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 311 Susan Doris 14-Aug-18 05:31
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 303 MDaines 14-Aug-18 07:28
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 299 DUNE 14-Aug-18 10:13
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 297 MDaines 14-Aug-18 10:31
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 286 DUNE 14-Aug-18 11:26
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 293 MDaines 14-Aug-18 12:28
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 290 DUNE 14-Aug-18 12:46
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 292 MDaines 14-Aug-18 13:38
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 419 KsFisher 19-Aug-18 01:04
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 295 KsFisher 14-Aug-18 16:35
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 296 cladking 14-Aug-18 20:11
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 271 KsFisher 17-Aug-18 20:19
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 289 KsFisher 17-Aug-18 21:41
Re: Paradigm Paralysis 297 KsFisher 17-Aug-18 23:57
Mod Note > Duplicate Topic Merged 278 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Aug-18 12:55


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.