> Carol- I have never stated I could rebut the BALL
> shape of EARTH on any but a few subjects. I would
> have responded to myself with skepticism, but be
> willing to look into the subject of FLAT EARTH,
> if I was approached on it. When I purchased my
> property to build my now home, I started being
> exposed to about 100 miles of mountain range over
> 210 degrees of view plan 1000 feet over the Fraser
> River in British Columbia Canada.
> The ecosystem in front of me started to reveal
> it’s reality. I view commercial airliners
> traveling over 100 miles of dead straight flight
> Even with this site calculation
> [www.metabunk.org] The river, the
> flight paths, the freezing level snow lines should
> have a visible curve. The valley floor is dead
> flat farm land with a river running 80 miles to
> the Pacific Ocean with only 37 feet of drop from
> my location.
> Distance = 70 Miles (369600 Feet), View Height =
> 1000 Feet (12000 Inches) Radius = 3959 Miles
> (20903520 Feet)
> Results ignoring refraction
> Horizon = 38.73 Miles (204470.14 Feet)
> Bulge = 816.89 Feet (9802.67 Inches)
> Drop = 3267.75 Feet (39212.97 Inches)
> Hidden= 652.22 Feet (7826.66 Inches)
> Horizon Dip = 0.560 Degrees, (0.0098 Radians)
> With Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83
> Miles (24387440 Feet)
> Refracted Horizon = 41.83 Miles (220852.62 Feet)
> Refracted Drop= 2800.87 Feet (33610.42 Inches)
> Refracted Hidden= 453.63 Feet (5443.52 Inches)
> Refracted Dip = 0.519 Degrees, (0.0091 Radians)
> You have placed many restriction on me to respond
> to your 5 questions. All these questions have
> rebuttals by people that have take the time to do
> the presentations at various levels of
> comprehension. I have not put any restrictions on
> the responses I have requested.
> The Globe model’s foundation is based COMPLETELY
> ON an unproved theory of GRAVITY that not one
> single human being can explain.
> Comments have assumed many things about me that
> are false.
> I would far rather believe on proven, reliable,
> repeatable demonstrations of BOYANCY AND DENSITY
> THEN THE THEORY OF GRAVITY THAT
> NO HUMAN BEING CAN INTELLIGENTLY DEMONSTRATE. You
> have a huge problem with this point.
> I just met a retired jet pilot that has flown with
> the BLUE ANGLES as well as all over the earth at
> high altitudes. His position is the Earth is a
> PLAN. Aircraft gyroscopes reflect a flat earth.
> No motion or curve is ever a consideration in
> flight. Flight path routes and mileages prove a
> flat earth.
> You or anyone else on the blog have not commented
> on Bill Nyes Confession that we live on a closed
> system and can not leave. This is just one of many
> points made.
> I joined this blog to genuinely share my
> experiences with people that I considered as being
> able to grasp new and different concepts. I have
> been shocked at the immature responses from this
> Both sides of this GLOBE/FLAT STATIONARY EARTH
> debate have
> many arguments the other side can not explain.
> Some of the biggest questions are about
> Antarctica, its treat, the heavy military controls
> over the region, The fact that NASA was created at
> the same time as the Antarctica Treaty. The fact
> that 50 countries can agree on this treaty but no
> other issue on the face of the earth, is
> The oceans have been navigated, by sextants,
> tracing back to the 1200’s with accuracy,
> questions have to be raised on WHY??? I know what
> the arguments are, but really think about it. I
> have a fairly powerful telescope and I was really
> disappointed when I observed the stars. It was so
> disappointing I don’t bother any more.
> This FLAT EARTH revival will not go away, it will
> only keep building, it would be wonderful for
> pressure to put to bare on governments to have a
> expedition circumnavigate the 60 degree south
> latitude with many members of all walks of life
> and the media on board to witness the travel
> distance with course charting. If Antarctica is a
> circle continent they will always have to correct
> coarse to steer towards it. If it is a complete
> circle continent with
> a dome over the earth at the outer perimeter, the
> course will have to always change steering away
> from it. The mileages will be completely different
> by about 4-5 times. This would put to rest the
> shape of earth. Culters going back all through
> history have flat earth maps, this debate needs to
> be put to BED!
> Donald Trump is currently baiting NASA to go to
> MARS. The truth is going to come out. I have
> on-screen pictures of comments about NASA he has
> made on a live video presentation on the flat
> earth, I would post them for you but don’t know
> how to load them to this site.
I'm sure anyone reading that delusional whine, full of falsehoods, misrepresentations and conspiracy, is having a hard time believing that someone could be so ignorant and credulous as to believe the earth is flat, in the second decade of the 21st century.
Get a grip, man! How on earth do you get through your day, harbouring such self-delusion?
And I see you won't answer my five questions. I did not put any restrictions on you - I only asked that you answer them in a rational fashion using your own words. That won't be forthcoming, I see. And we all know why. There is only one answer to each, and that answer involves admitting that the earth is a sphere.
So don't expect any respect or accommodation for your beliefs from anyone here. You can see that people are laughing at you, and deep down, you know perfectly well why. You'd best go off to some flat earth echo chamber with your claims. Nobody here takes you seriously.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 24-Mar-18 20:13 by carolb.