Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

Well...communication with our own is hard enough. How are we going to communicate with beings so different and so much more technologically advanced than we are?

I’m not so sure anymore that “technologically advanced” is the correct explicative phrase to use . . . From most accounts, though . . . definitely different to the point of singularly unique. . .

I suspect that there is some form of exchange already, but suspicion is not evidence and ignorance for how to do so is lopsided to the unknown at present. Trying to work out and collect data or observations to support a tentative hypothesis, as well as user process, let’s say, is not easy as well as sporadic.

I started with several questions, anyway, a while back:: :

What is the experience one traverses, endures, and attempts to express or understand? Can one name criteria for accomplishing otherwise linear mode expression by addressing the six interrogatories How? Where? When? What? Why? Who? As a single group simultaneously? In parallel, not the usual serial mode – One after the other after the other way of using questions to solicit information (data, if Artificial Intelligence (AI)), knowledge, and examples of successful communication transmissions otherwise taken into the brain by the traditional sensory apparatuses from the serial mode form.

Does an illustration or painting or sculpture or rock carving address or portray quantitative information that contains all six interrogatories simultaneously with a definable quantity that can be parsed into the six interrogatories if interpreted into linear form? What of an acoustical event? Can an oscillating wave type pattern measure a frequency range if it were to be transferred onto a cathode ray tube (CRT). Granted, a bit dated. . . If there’s an intermediary form of communication is it recognized strictly as visual, acoustical, tactile, odiferous, or inclusive of the non-traditional senses as distinguished from the traditional five Aristotelian senses? How unaware are folks of the aging effects upon them throughout their corporeal lives? Is there one group or multiple groups of the senses to consider? Aging effects tend to sneak up on most folks as an insidious outsider suddenly apparent with very different outcomes. The advantage might be a retained sequence of experiences in memory. How do Wernicke's area and Broca's areas of the brain get used for non vocal cord word exchange? What are their roles in the overall communication process?

These are a few of the many questions that seem to have merit so far. At least I think so. Definitely intellectual exercises I’ve conducted over the years, but what’s likely to make solid science is where experiment, experience, and expression meet the three requirements of the scientific process. Science is not the only game in town, either, so to speak, when singular events are noted such as in a group, crowd or where the others are concerned. It has not been convenient in that way.

Then there’s this language conundrum the presumptive explainer, NOT. It’s lengthy, it’s linear, and it’s imprecise, but it is a tool that is used. Seemingly needing constant revision and updates for spontaneous changes it seems to instigate somehow. It’s certainly a major contributor to the Great Debate.

Language seems inadequate by itself as it is imprecise most of the time. I use most of the time because time, as it is feebly understood, hasn’t run out just yet to make an accounting of any history total. At any rate, it certainly raises a few questions with darn few answers – at least none that I recognize, anyway.

Thanks for the link . . . I have an interest in Astrobiology, Physiology, and Biophysics.

"Mind like parachute, must be open to function." ~ Charlie Chan - Famous Chinese detective character

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Pentagon's UFO Program 1274 Aine 17-Dec-17 19:48
Mod Note > Topic Moved 84 Dr. Troglodyte 17-Dec-17 20:10
Fighter aircraft 149 Reagent 17-Dec-17 21:13
Re: Fighter aircraft 117 Aine 17-Dec-17 21:24
Oh please! 116 Reagent 17-Dec-17 22:40
Re: Oh please! 94 Aine 17-Dec-17 22:55
Apologies! 86 Reagent 17-Dec-17 23:14
Re: Apologies! 83 Aine 17-Dec-17 23:17
No Worries 90 Reagent 18-Dec-17 03:43
Re: No Worries 85 Archaic 18-Dec-17 03:54
Familiar acronym 66 Reagent 19-Dec-17 20:56
Re: No Worries 67 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:31
Fun, too 67 Reagent 18-Dec-17 18:51
Re: Fun, too 65 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:59
Language conundrum 62 Reagent 19-Dec-17 04:58
We are not alone: Alien Presence 86 Sirhope 19-Dec-17 07:13
We are not alone; neither are they 66 Reagent 19-Dec-17 08:47
Re: We are not alone; neither are they 68 Sirhope 19-Dec-17 09:34
We are not alone; neither are they 76 Reagent 19-Dec-17 12:03
Title 14, Section 1211 of U.S. Federal Code: 55 Reagent 19-Dec-17 18:11
Re: Oh please! 88 Archaic 17-Dec-17 23:16
Re: Fighter aircraft 77 Archaic 17-Dec-17 22:46
Some context of what we're seeing in video 122 Archaic 17-Dec-17 22:36
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 100 Aine 17-Dec-17 22:48
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 74 Archaic 17-Dec-17 22:54
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 66 Aine 17-Dec-17 22:56
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 70 Aine 17-Dec-17 23:14
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 78 Archaic 17-Dec-17 23:54
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 84 Loki74 18-Dec-17 00:35
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 78 Loki74 18-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 67 Archaic 18-Dec-17 01:04
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 58 Loki74 18-Dec-17 01:22
Re: Some context of what we're seeing in video 62 Archaic 18-Dec-17 01:46
Here, Loki - Lazar's Credibility 81 Archaic 18-Dec-17 02:35
Re: Here, Loki - Lazar's Credibility 88 Loki74 18-Dec-17 11:01
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 73 Loki74 18-Dec-17 00:22
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 77 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 03:44
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 57 jeffreyw 18-Dec-17 03:47
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 69 Archaic 18-Dec-17 04:07
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 61 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:33
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 54 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:50
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 72 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 05:10
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 65 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:49
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 72 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 17:41
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 59 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:10
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 70 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:25
1 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 62 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:35
Re: 1 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 57 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:38
Re: 1 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 46 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:43
2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 51 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:41
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 50 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:50
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 54 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:58
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 49 Aine 18-Dec-17 19:03
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 55 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 19:06
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 46 Aine 18-Dec-17 19:08
Re: 2 of 2: The Pentagon's UFO Program 48 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 19:09
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 74 Susan Doris 18-Dec-17 06:41
just got and started reading Leslie Kean's book on my kindle 67 greengirl5 18-Dec-17 07:02
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 71 Archaic 18-Dec-17 07:20
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 70 Susan Doris 18-Dec-17 10:09
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 64 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:56
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 69 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 17:34
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 50 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:46
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 50 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:12
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 50 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:14
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 47 Poster Boy 18-Dec-17 18:22
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 45 Aine 18-Dec-17 18:39
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 78 Vanya 18-Dec-17 07:36
Already posted 68 drrayeye 18-Dec-17 08:50
Re: Already posted 68 Vanya 18-Dec-17 10:09
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 78 Aine 18-Dec-17 15:54
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 76 Vanya 19-Dec-17 07:03
This today 86 Poster Boy 20-Dec-17 00:58
Re: This today 87 Aine 20-Dec-17 01:03
Re: This today 71 Aine 20-Dec-17 18:40
High hopes! 58 greengirl5 20-Dec-17 22:11
Re: High hopes! 51 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:11
Zimbabwae UFO case 54 Archaic 21-Dec-17 01:26
Re: Zimbabwae UFO case 54 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:31
Re: Zimbabwae UFO case 53 Archaic 21-Dec-17 01:41
Re: Zimbabwae UFO case 45 Aine 21-Dec-17 02:02
Re: Zimbabwae UFO case 49 Archaic 21-Dec-17 02:13
Could this be it? 48 greengirl5 21-Dec-17 03:18
Re: Could this be it? 41 Archaic 21-Dec-17 04:18
And the one I could/did find... 39 Racho 21-Dec-17 05:34
Re: This today 53 Archaic 21-Dec-17 01:23
Re: This today 48 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:25
Re: This today 33 Archaic 21-Dec-17 04:23
Re: This today 57 Nolondil 21-Dec-17 01:27
Re: This today 42 Archaic 21-Dec-17 01:31
Re: This today 48 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:39
Re: This today 45 Archaic 21-Dec-17 01:52
Re: This today 44 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:57
Re: This today 43 Archaic 21-Dec-17 02:00
very limited consideration imv 48 Racho 21-Dec-17 01:34
Re: very limited consideration imv 51 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:37
try to envision 51 Racho 21-Dec-17 01:47
Re: try to envision 52 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:50
Re: try to envision 61 Nolondil 21-Dec-17 02:23
Re: try to envision 47 Archaic 21-Dec-17 04:24
Re: try to envision 41 Racho 21-Dec-17 06:19
Re: try to envision 46 Aine 21-Dec-17 14:53
Re: try to envision 62 Aine 21-Dec-17 17:47
Re: This today 46 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:34
Other angles 119 Reagent 21-Dec-17 07:50
Re: Other angles 65 Aine 21-Dec-17 15:09
Other angles; in progress and deployed 60 Reagent 21-Dec-17 19:00
Re: Other angles; in progress and deployed 66 Aine 21-Dec-17 21:31
In progress and deployed 54 Reagent 22-Dec-17 00:30
Re: In progress and deployed 42 Aine 22-Dec-17 00:59
Re: This today 44 Poster Boy 22-Dec-17 16:43
Re: This today 41 Aine 22-Dec-17 20:39
Re: This today 42 Poster Boy 22-Dec-17 21:58
Re: This today 40 Aine 22-Dec-17 23:37
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 53 WhoWeird 20-Dec-17 21:32
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 55 Aine 21-Dec-17 01:54
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 61 WhoWeird 21-Dec-17 02:18
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 53 Archaic 21-Dec-17 04:27
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 40 WhoWeird 21-Dec-17 12:44
Are all these kids corrupted? 44 Racho 21-Dec-17 06:27
Re: Are all these kids corrupted? 45 WhoWeird 21-Dec-17 12:51
Re: Are all these kids corrupted? 43 WhoWeird 21-Dec-17 13:21
Re: Are all these kids corrupted? 50 Aine 21-Dec-17 14:59
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 48 Aine 21-Dec-17 14:51
Re: The Pentagon's UFO Program 56 Archaic 21-Dec-17 02:22
CNN interview with pilot and Pentagon Leader 58 Archaic 21-Dec-17 20:44
Re: CNN interview with pilot and Pentagon Leader 60 Aine 21-Dec-17 21:29
Re: CNN interview with pilot and Pentagon Leader 54 drrayeye 21-Dec-17 23:53
Re: CNN interview with pilot and Pentagon Leader 62 Aine 22-Dec-17 02:24
disbelievers? 71 drrayeye 22-Dec-17 18:11
Re: disbelievers? 68 Aine 22-Dec-17 20:33
Re: disbelievers? 64 drrayeye 23-Dec-17 02:48
Re: disbelievers? 56 Aine 23-Dec-17 13:47
You don't see the difference? 66 drrayeye 23-Dec-17 18:41
Re: You don't see the difference? 55 Eddie Larry 23-Dec-17 19:32
Re: You don't see the difference? 97 Poster Boy 23-Dec-17 20:04
Re: You don't see the difference? 72 DUNE 02-Jan-18 16:59
Re: You don't see the difference? 126 Aine 02-Jan-18 18:49


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.