If by proof you mean something that stands up to a current scientific model then as proof it probably falls short. Though the 5 proofs do in fact display a scientific reasoning and a method.
If by proof you mean enough to make a strong case for the possibility then I think it does an admirable job. Though not in and of its self enough to carry the case.
|Aquinas proof of God in Five Ways||144||Citizen Attorney||22-Feb-07 01:41|
|Re: Aquinas proof of God in Five Ways||113||Ghia||22-Feb-07 02:14|
|Here are the Five Ways||100||Citizen Attorney||22-Feb-07 02:52|
|Re: Here are the Five Ways||96||Raja||22-Feb-07 21:14|
|Re: Here are the Five Ways||88||Avatar||13-Jul-07 20:46|
|Re: Here are the Five Ways||96||Raja||13-Jul-07 22:16|
|Re: Here are the Five Ways||92||Joyeuse||05-Mar-08 08:23|
|Physics proof of God in one way :)))))))||94||Astikapati||22-Feb-07 03:39|
|Re: Physics proof of God in one way :)))))))||67||Ghia||22-Feb-07 14:55|
|Re: Physics proof of God in one way :)))))))||115||Farseeker||22-Feb-07 22:27|
|Is the Universe digital? I'm not buying that.||85||come on pilgrim||23-Feb-07 01:17|
|Re: Aquinas proof of God in Five Ways||107||David L||22-Feb-07 21:34|
|Re: Aquinas proof of God in Five Ways||94||Farseeker||22-Feb-07 22:23|
|All Things Desire||85||Raja||04-Mar-08 21:30|