Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
thanks David that's great news :-)
It's about time the truth hit the fan(s) pun intended !

I love particularly this part :
At first, some of its points seem very esoteric, as when a scientist explains how, on a subatomic level, it's possible for a particle to be in two places at the same time, or to disappear into or appear from what could be an infinity of invisible dimensions.

Or how, according to certain aspects of quantum physics, there's really no reason why we shouldn't be able to envision the future just as easily as we remember the past, since the past, present and future are all part of the same continuum.

Somewhat easier to grasp is the scientists' consensus that the observable world is a kind of "matrix of energy," in which our consciousness is a powerful force, and what we see internally is as "real" as what we view externally, and capable of altering that outer reality.

Thus, quantum physics vindicates meditation and even prayer. Indeed, in one experiment in which a large group of meditators tried to see if they could reduce the soaring violent crime rate of Washington, D.C., by 25 percent, they reportedly did exactly that.

In another experiment, a Japanese physicist made a photographic record that proved, to his satisfaction at least, that the blessing of a Zen Buddhist priest changed the molecular structure of the holy water he was blessing.

Conversely, this power of consciousness has immense potential for harm, especially when it's turned inward as self-abuse. "If thought can do this to water, think of what it can do to you," the film repeats several times as a kind of chorus.

In a physical universe in which consciousness is all powerful, religion has validity and the miracles of an avatar like Jesus Christ seem quite credible, but all those millions who lined up to see Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" are not going to like this movie.

The God view suggested by quantum physics is more like the Tao, a force field in which we are all truly one, sin has no theological meaning and organized religions that see a vindictive God removed from nature are, as one scientist says, a "blasphemy."

from your link.
Best,


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
"What the Bleep Do We Know?" 263 David L 15-Apr-05 04:24
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 198 Astikapati 15-Apr-05 05:52
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 166 whytebyrd 15-Apr-05 07:10
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 163 David L 15-Apr-05 15:14
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 135 Michael Hayes 15-Apr-05 13:03
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 114 David L 15-Apr-05 15:33
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 146 Joyeuse 16-Apr-05 01:35
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 206 Raja 15-Apr-05 18:56
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 163 Joyeuse 16-Apr-05 01:11
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 125 solar_fox 17-Apr-05 03:45
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 123 Joyeuse 26-Apr-05 13:42
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 146 debraregypt 26-Apr-05 12:44
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 139 David L 26-Apr-05 23:29
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 143 Joyeuse 27-Apr-05 00:31
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 168 David L 27-Apr-05 00:57
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 134 Nobody 27-Apr-05 05:50
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 134 debraregypt 27-Apr-05 12:55
PS.... and their just the one's who need a change of underwear 171 debraregypt 27-Apr-05 13:00
Re: PS.... and their just the one's who need a change of underwear 140 Joyeuse 27-Apr-05 16:41
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 159 Joyeuse 27-Apr-05 16:37
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 170 solar_fox 28-Apr-05 01:37
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 130 Joyeuse 28-Apr-05 15:47
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 106 poster72 29-Apr-05 20:12
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 133 David L 29-Apr-05 21:21
Re: "What the Bleep Do We Know?" 132 Hoppy 07-May-05 23:31


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.