You said: “That is my opinion, yes because of the issue of the Fall.”
You leave me totally in the dark with such remarks. Apart from setting my associative powers to overdrive, I have no real understanding over what you mean.
Please explain a bit further. I really want to understand where you are coming from in these matters.
You said: “I'm not anti individual Masons as most Masons aren't told what the adepts of Freemasonry believe; they have to find it out for themselves. In fact, many Masons are deliberately misled.”
Do you mean to say that within masonry there is a scam within a scam as in that they all fool each other? And if so, where are they misled away from anyway, by whom, for what purpose?
You said: “I'm sure the original meaning of Osiris probably was different but I still don't believe this deity really had mankind’s interests at heart.
Erm, as far as I understand, Osiris was a symbol created by the AE that, over the centuries, went through several stages in it's meaning. How in heavens name can that be extrapolated into “Osiris did not had mankind’s interests at heart”.
Aren’t you comparing apples and pears?
Aren’t you putting to much reality into the Jesus myth?
Check this for a reasonable easy to read story over the Osiris cult.
You said: “I don't have much regard for Churchianity.”
Sheesh, I think we have found yet more common ground :-))