Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I can't believe this!!!!! I am reading a book called "Mary Magdalene, Christianity's Hidden Goddess" by Lynn Picknett.

You might remember she wrote some books with Clive Prince about the Turin Shroud and the one about the Templars.

Anyway, I have repeatedly read that there is a phallic group of rocks in this very heretical painting of Da Vinci's but I could never make it out. To me, the rocks were as about as phallic as a carrot. I've read over and over that its a phallus complete with two "rocks" but couldn;t see it at all.

Then I saw it!!!!!!!! It is absolutely anatomically correct down to blood veins and "rocks" and...well...I better be careful what I say!

(I can see that we could be on thin ice here as far as what is appropriate to discuss...so do me a favor and be grown-up about this!)

I just can't believe he got away with this. He most certainly understood psychology and what it really means about humans "having eyes to see." He must have known the average person would never make it out because its the last thing they would think in relation to the "virgin" mother.

The first case of hidden pictures! LOL! Can you see it..."Okay Da Vinci Junior...in this painting, you need to find an erect phallus." ...LOL

Wow...medieval pornography...whoda thunk?!!!

The reasons he did this are the real gems in the story.

And to think the church paid him good money for this work of art!

;-)Cleo

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Virgin of the Rocks 568 Cleopatra 18-Feb-04 20:22
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 130 ArmchairObserver 18-Feb-04 20:55
you scared me...lol 144 Cleopatra 18-Feb-04 21:05
Re: you scared me...lol 138 ArmchairObserver 18-Feb-04 21:17
Re: you scared me...lol 124 ArmchairObserver 18-Feb-04 21:19
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 137 timewaster 19-Feb-04 04:00
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 152 Cleopatra 19-Feb-04 10:47
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 130 timewaster 19-Feb-04 15:47
images better on a Mac 134 ananda 19-Feb-04 18:08
Re: images better on a Mac 132 timewaster 19-Feb-04 23:55
Re: images better on a Mac 136 ananda 20-Feb-04 00:02
Re: images better on a Mac 130 timewaster 20-Feb-04 00:23
Question for Cleo 131 ananda 20-Feb-04 02:46
Re: Question for Cleo 111 Cleopatra 20-Feb-04 09:28
No pic from Greg, however.. 97 ananda 20-Feb-04 10:42
Re: No pic from Greg, however.. 144 Cleopatra 20-Feb-04 11:37
The quick reply... 123 ananda 20-Feb-04 12:53
Re: No pic from Greg, however.. 142 xantung 20-Feb-04 12:09
Uh oh... 123 ananda 20-Feb-04 13:05
Re: Uh oh... 118 Mark Staab 20-Feb-04 17:05
Answer and correction 121 ananda 20-Feb-04 17:56
Re: Uh oh... 130 Cleopatra 20-Feb-04 18:34
Re: Uh oh... 226 Mark Staab 20-Feb-04 21:21
I bet Sister Beckett never discussed this painting! n/t. ;-) 141 Cleopatra 19-Feb-04 13:04
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 124 Lee McGiffen 19-Feb-04 10:59
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 128 Cleopatra 19-Feb-04 12:44
Re: The Virgin of the Rocks 131 ArmchairObserver 19-Feb-04 16:08
That's the wrong one actually... 148 Cleopatra 19-Feb-04 19:56
Re: That's the wrong one actually... 142 ArmchairObserver 19-Feb-04 22:27
Both have phallic symbols.. 131 ananda 20-Feb-04 00:05
Re: That's the wrong one actually... 132 timewaster 20-Feb-04 00:17
Re: That's the wrong one actually... 184 xantung 20-Feb-04 06:24
Re: That's the wrong one actually... 131 ArmchairObserver 20-Feb-04 06:25
Regarding haloes 122 ananda 20-Feb-04 19:35
Re: Regarding haloes 139 ArmchairObserver 20-Feb-04 21:13


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.