Inner Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on.
Hi wirelessguru1
Please don't think that I am being argumentative.Obviously I probably don't have the knowledge or experience dealing with this stuff as you do.I'm just trying to understand.But my understanding is that one can only exist if the other one does.A change in one part of the formula changes the other part of the formula but the change doesn't present an inverse.In your formula your saying that if time changes then the frequency changes.As such all other frequencies would then change in the same relationship.But the change occurs only because the unit of measurement(time) has changed.This change doesn't produce an inverse.Therefore I'm having trouble understanding the illusion part.An illusion is a false impression or appearance.Neither time or frequency appear to be a false impression.
Are you trying to say that the opposite of reality is illusion?
Thank you,dane
Please don't think that I am being argumentative.Obviously I probably don't have the knowledge or experience dealing with this stuff as you do.I'm just trying to understand.But my understanding is that one can only exist if the other one does.A change in one part of the formula changes the other part of the formula but the change doesn't present an inverse.In your formula your saying that if time changes then the frequency changes.As such all other frequencies would then change in the same relationship.But the change occurs only because the unit of measurement(time) has changed.This change doesn't produce an inverse.Therefore I'm having trouble understanding the illusion part.An illusion is a false impression or appearance.Neither time or frequency appear to be a false impression.
Are you trying to say that the opposite of reality is illusion?
Thank you,dane
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.