> As an aside, one very appealing thing to me about Graham
> Hancock is that he has never, as far as I know, said that he
> has proof. He states his findings in a passionate way, and
> presents compelling arguments yes, but not as dogma as so
> many of his peers and establishment academics do. He uses the
> word "may" a lot.
>
> Harry

Graham is looking for physical evidence of a physical civilization, and therefore proof is possible, if not yet available. I will say that the high Atlantis was non-physical--etheric--while the physical Atlantis was by definition, not. The etheric can become physical, however, and so the proof is "out there" and some of it is very visible and tangible--like the GP.

There is no physical proof for what I've been discussing--the science of the soul. Personal experience is the only proof, and no one can download their experience into someone else's head--it has to be gotten by the seeker.
The old "seek and you will find, knock and it will be opened to you" thing.

For a brief explanation of my path, what I've been doing since 1975, check this out:
[www.ishkiia.net]

There's tons more on the net by searching on "shabd path" "logos", but this one is very clear.
David