Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David Lamond wrote:
>
> The photon belt thing is completely bogus. If you recall, it
> was supposed to happen in 1996. Nothing happened... The
> Pleiades have nothing to do with earth-consciousness or
> earth's destiny.

Well, I never heard about a photon belt in 1996. As far as I know the major part of the changing of the age was always supposed to be in 2012. But there are always crazies who have absolutely nothing to base their ideas on. Just look at all the people who said 2000 was going to be the end of the world. Complete rubbish based solely on the fact it was a millinium date. Anyone worth their salt in the world of the wise knows that the calendar we follow today in the west has nothing to do with being in harmony with the universe. The correct calendar was always the ancient one, based on the movements of the moon, planets and heavens. And the 2012 date comes from the ancient system, not the Gregorian one.

I would also argue that every body in the universe has something to do with Earth-consciousness and Earth's Destiny. And the human consciousness as a whole does as well. And the sooner we humans as a whole reach an understanding of how we are a part of the creation of that destiny, the better!

Study in the field of human spirituality and wisdom and you would soon learn that the pleiades has always been a system of upmost importance and connection to the Earth. So is Orion. A good starting point for you might be Barbara Marciniak's book called Bringers of the Dawn.

>
> The stars and planets REFLECT the karmas of people and
> nations and planets--they do not cause them.

Ummm. No. Sorry but anyone in the field would tell you this is an incorrect interpretation. And besides, energetically speaking, it makes no sense. And karma has little to do with the stars and planets. Only in a very indirect sense.

This is why
> people have trouble believing in astrology--because they put
> the cart before the horse, and of course it doesn't make sense.

I'm afraid you've got it backwards. Energetics emit from all things affecting all things. It's not the other way around. By your logic its the tides changing that move the moon instead of the moon affecting the movements of the tides.

You seem to think the movements of the Earth, planets, heavens and moon don't have a profound energetic impact on life. I say they do. The ancients knew it, the indigenous peoples know it, and the wise of the world know it as well.

And besides, the evidence is on our side I'm afraid.

Best,
Cleo

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Something I've noticed... 452 Jergat 16-Jan-04 04:39
Yes! ...n/t. 127 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 04:48
Re: Something I've noticed... 118 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 155 Jergat 16-Jan-04 05:17
Re: Something I've noticed... 130 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 05:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 129 Jergat 16-Jan-04 06:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 171 sean 17-Jan-04 01:37
Re: Something I've noticed... 150 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:06
Re: Something I've noticed... 158 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 152 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 20:09
(outside of the Box) .... 126 Thirdwave 16-Jan-04 22:49
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 139 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 07:46
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 123 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 10:00
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 155 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 15:04
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 125 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:26
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 149 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 182 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 22:41
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 148 Briffits 18-Jan-04 22:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 117 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:00
Re: Something I've noticed... 118 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:11
Re: to explain further 162 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:39
Re: to explain further 149 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:00
Re: to explain further 175 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:18
Re: 2012 179 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:36
Re: to explain further 154 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:44
Re: to explain further 127 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:01
Re: to explain further 150 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 02:11
Re: to explain further 121 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:34
Re: to explain further 125 Hoppy 17-Jan-04 03:38
Re: to explain further 118 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:25
Re: to explain further 128 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 09:26
Re: to explain further 117 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 05:48
Re: to explain further 139 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 116 David L 17-Jan-04 03:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 148 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 08:06
2012 is NOT the end of the world. 128 Cleopatra 17-Jan-04 09:14
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 158 David L 17-Jan-04 16:39
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 119 Cleopatra 18-Jan-04 10:12
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 144 David L 18-Jan-04 17:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 142 David L 18-Jan-04 18:04
No "One Way" but many 118 Thirdwave 19-Jan-04 00:32
Re: No "One Way" but many 130 David L 19-Jan-04 14:57
Re: No "One Way" but many 124 Milo 19-Jan-04 15:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 113 David L 19-Jan-04 23:43
Re: No "One Way" but many 116 Milo 19-Jan-04 23:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 222 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:22
Re: No "One Way" but many 134 Milo 20-Jan-04 00:00
Re: No "One Way" but many 232 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:20
Re: No "One Way" but many 131 RichardC 19-Jan-04 16:25
Re: No "One Way" but many 145 David L 19-Jan-04 23:50
Re: No "One Way" but many 153 RichardC 20-Jan-04 14:30
Re: No "One Way" but many 141 Milo 20-Jan-04 14:46
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 124 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:40
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 148 David L 19-Jan-04 23:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 170 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:34
Re: Something I've noticed... 123 David L 17-Jan-04 16:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 157 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 148 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:55
Re: Something I've noticed... 173 Earache 18-Jan-04 13:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 129 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:06
Read these. 135 Earache 20-Jan-04 15:13
Re: Something I've noticed... 179 RichardC 18-Jan-04 21:58
Re: Something I've noticed... 120 Dominick Ohrbeck 20-Jan-04 07:03
Re: Something I've noticed... 117 Trygve Hogebol 20-Jan-04 08:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 147 fisherman 20-Jan-04 18:56
Re: Something I've noticed... 149 Trygve Hogebol 21-Jan-04 00:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 134 fisherman 21-Jan-04 15:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 156 Melusine 20-Jan-04 18:38
Re: Something I've noticed... 139 Hoppy 29-Jan-04 01:51
Re: Something I've noticed... 179 wirelessguru1 29-Jan-04 02:51
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 128 Nebankh 06-Feb-04 10:35
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 133 Jergat 11-Feb-04 01:02
Re: Pisces 272 Nebankh 11-Feb-04 12:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.