Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David Lamond wrote:
>
> The photon belt thing is completely bogus. If you recall, it
> was supposed to happen in 1996. Nothing happened... The
> Pleiades have nothing to do with earth-consciousness or
> earth's destiny.

Well, I never heard about a photon belt in 1996. As far as I know the major part of the changing of the age was always supposed to be in 2012. But there are always crazies who have absolutely nothing to base their ideas on. Just look at all the people who said 2000 was going to be the end of the world. Complete rubbish based solely on the fact it was a millinium date. Anyone worth their salt in the world of the wise knows that the calendar we follow today in the west has nothing to do with being in harmony with the universe. The correct calendar was always the ancient one, based on the movements of the moon, planets and heavens. And the 2012 date comes from the ancient system, not the Gregorian one.

I would also argue that every body in the universe has something to do with Earth-consciousness and Earth's Destiny. And the human consciousness as a whole does as well. And the sooner we humans as a whole reach an understanding of how we are a part of the creation of that destiny, the better!

Study in the field of human spirituality and wisdom and you would soon learn that the pleiades has always been a system of upmost importance and connection to the Earth. So is Orion. A good starting point for you might be Barbara Marciniak's book called Bringers of the Dawn.

>
> The stars and planets REFLECT the karmas of people and
> nations and planets--they do not cause them.

Ummm. No. Sorry but anyone in the field would tell you this is an incorrect interpretation. And besides, energetically speaking, it makes no sense. And karma has little to do with the stars and planets. Only in a very indirect sense.

This is why
> people have trouble believing in astrology--because they put
> the cart before the horse, and of course it doesn't make sense.

I'm afraid you've got it backwards. Energetics emit from all things affecting all things. It's not the other way around. By your logic its the tides changing that move the moon instead of the moon affecting the movements of the tides.

You seem to think the movements of the Earth, planets, heavens and moon don't have a profound energetic impact on life. I say they do. The ancients knew it, the indigenous peoples know it, and the wise of the world know it as well.

And besides, the evidence is on our side I'm afraid.

Best,
Cleo

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Something I've noticed... 478 Jergat 16-Jan-04 04:39
Yes! ...n/t. 147 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 04:48
Re: Something I've noticed... 126 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 162 Jergat 16-Jan-04 05:17
Re: Something I've noticed... 139 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 05:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 148 Jergat 16-Jan-04 06:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 190 sean 17-Jan-04 01:37
Re: Something I've noticed... 169 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:06
Re: Something I've noticed... 177 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 169 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 20:09
(outside of the Box) .... 144 Thirdwave 16-Jan-04 22:49
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 158 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 07:46
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 132 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 10:00
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 173 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 15:04
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 143 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:26
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 166 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 202 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 22:41
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 165 Briffits 18-Jan-04 22:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 137 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:00
Re: Something I've noticed... 138 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:11
Re: to explain further 181 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:39
Re: to explain further 168 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:00
Re: to explain further 199 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:18
Re: 2012 200 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:36
Re: to explain further 172 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:44
Re: to explain further 145 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:01
Re: to explain further 170 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 02:11
Re: to explain further 137 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:34
Re: to explain further 145 Hoppy 17-Jan-04 03:38
Re: to explain further 136 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:25
Re: to explain further 146 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 09:26
Re: to explain further 124 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 05:48
Re: to explain further 146 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 134 David L 17-Jan-04 03:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 168 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 08:06
2012 is NOT the end of the world. 135 Cleopatra 17-Jan-04 09:14
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 177 David L 17-Jan-04 16:39
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 138 Cleopatra 18-Jan-04 10:12
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 152 David L 18-Jan-04 17:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 162 David L 18-Jan-04 18:04
No "One Way" but many 137 Thirdwave 19-Jan-04 00:32
Re: No "One Way" but many 147 David L 19-Jan-04 14:57
Re: No "One Way" but many 142 Milo 19-Jan-04 15:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 134 David L 19-Jan-04 23:43
Re: No "One Way" but many 137 Milo 19-Jan-04 23:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 239 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:22
Re: No "One Way" but many 154 Milo 20-Jan-04 00:00
Re: No "One Way" but many 251 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:20
Re: No "One Way" but many 150 RichardC 19-Jan-04 16:25
Re: No "One Way" but many 165 David L 19-Jan-04 23:50
Re: No "One Way" but many 176 RichardC 20-Jan-04 14:30
Re: No "One Way" but many 159 Milo 20-Jan-04 14:46
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 143 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:40
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 156 David L 19-Jan-04 23:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 181 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:34
Re: Something I've noticed... 143 David L 17-Jan-04 16:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 174 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 172 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:55
Re: Something I've noticed... 191 Earache 18-Jan-04 13:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 136 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:06
Read these. 157 Earache 20-Jan-04 15:13
Re: Something I've noticed... 199 RichardC 18-Jan-04 21:58
Re: Something I've noticed... 137 Dominick Ohrbeck 20-Jan-04 07:03
Re: Something I've noticed... 124 Trygve Hogebol 20-Jan-04 08:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 163 fisherman 20-Jan-04 18:56
Re: Something I've noticed... 169 Trygve Hogebol 21-Jan-04 00:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 154 fisherman 21-Jan-04 15:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 176 Melusine 20-Jan-04 18:38
Re: Something I've noticed... 157 Hoppy 29-Jan-04 01:51
Re: Something I've noticed... 187 wirelessguru1 29-Jan-04 02:51
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 148 Nebankh 06-Feb-04 10:35
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 153 Jergat 11-Feb-04 01:02
Re: Pisces 291 Nebankh 11-Feb-04 12:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.