Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David Lamond wrote:
>
> The photon belt thing is completely bogus. If you recall, it
> was supposed to happen in 1996. Nothing happened... The
> Pleiades have nothing to do with earth-consciousness or
> earth's destiny.

Well, I never heard about a photon belt in 1996. As far as I know the major part of the changing of the age was always supposed to be in 2012. But there are always crazies who have absolutely nothing to base their ideas on. Just look at all the people who said 2000 was going to be the end of the world. Complete rubbish based solely on the fact it was a millinium date. Anyone worth their salt in the world of the wise knows that the calendar we follow today in the west has nothing to do with being in harmony with the universe. The correct calendar was always the ancient one, based on the movements of the moon, planets and heavens. And the 2012 date comes from the ancient system, not the Gregorian one.

I would also argue that every body in the universe has something to do with Earth-consciousness and Earth's Destiny. And the human consciousness as a whole does as well. And the sooner we humans as a whole reach an understanding of how we are a part of the creation of that destiny, the better!

Study in the field of human spirituality and wisdom and you would soon learn that the pleiades has always been a system of upmost importance and connection to the Earth. So is Orion. A good starting point for you might be Barbara Marciniak's book called Bringers of the Dawn.

>
> The stars and planets REFLECT the karmas of people and
> nations and planets--they do not cause them.

Ummm. No. Sorry but anyone in the field would tell you this is an incorrect interpretation. And besides, energetically speaking, it makes no sense. And karma has little to do with the stars and planets. Only in a very indirect sense.

This is why
> people have trouble believing in astrology--because they put
> the cart before the horse, and of course it doesn't make sense.

I'm afraid you've got it backwards. Energetics emit from all things affecting all things. It's not the other way around. By your logic its the tides changing that move the moon instead of the moon affecting the movements of the tides.

You seem to think the movements of the Earth, planets, heavens and moon don't have a profound energetic impact on life. I say they do. The ancients knew it, the indigenous peoples know it, and the wise of the world know it as well.

And besides, the evidence is on our side I'm afraid.

Best,
Cleo

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Something I've noticed... 420 Jergat 16-Jan-04 04:39
Yes! ...n/t. 119 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 04:48
Re: Something I've noticed... 109 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 145 Jergat 16-Jan-04 05:17
Re: Something I've noticed... 123 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 05:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 119 Jergat 16-Jan-04 06:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 154 sean 17-Jan-04 01:37
Re: Something I've noticed... 142 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:06
Re: Something I've noticed... 148 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 144 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 20:09
(outside of the Box) .... 116 Thirdwave 16-Jan-04 22:49
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 130 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 07:46
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 116 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 10:00
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 148 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 15:04
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 117 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:26
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 142 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 168 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 22:41
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 141 Briffits 18-Jan-04 22:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 110 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:00
Re: Something I've noticed... 110 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:11
Re: to explain further 155 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:39
Re: to explain further 141 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:00
Re: to explain further 163 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:18
Re: 2012 171 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:36
Re: to explain further 140 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:44
Re: to explain further 119 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:01
Re: to explain further 142 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 02:11
Re: to explain further 113 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:34
Re: to explain further 116 Hoppy 17-Jan-04 03:38
Re: to explain further 109 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:25
Re: to explain further 120 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 09:26
Re: to explain further 108 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 05:48
Re: to explain further 133 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 108 David L 17-Jan-04 03:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 137 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 08:06
2012 is NOT the end of the world. 121 Cleopatra 17-Jan-04 09:14
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 150 David L 17-Jan-04 16:39
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 113 Cleopatra 18-Jan-04 10:12
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 136 David L 18-Jan-04 17:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 135 David L 18-Jan-04 18:04
No "One Way" but many 111 Thirdwave 19-Jan-04 00:32
Re: No "One Way" but many 120 David L 19-Jan-04 14:57
Re: No "One Way" but many 117 Milo 19-Jan-04 15:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 107 David L 19-Jan-04 23:43
Re: No "One Way" but many 109 Milo 19-Jan-04 23:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 213 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:22
Re: No "One Way" but many 127 Milo 20-Jan-04 00:00
Re: No "One Way" but many 223 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:20
Re: No "One Way" but many 125 RichardC 19-Jan-04 16:25
Re: No "One Way" but many 137 David L 19-Jan-04 23:50
Re: No "One Way" but many 143 RichardC 20-Jan-04 14:30
Re: No "One Way" but many 134 Milo 20-Jan-04 14:46
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 116 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:40
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 141 David L 19-Jan-04 23:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 159 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:34
Re: Something I've noticed... 113 David L 17-Jan-04 16:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 150 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 137 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:55
Re: Something I've noticed... 165 Earache 18-Jan-04 13:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 121 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:06
Read these. 125 Earache 20-Jan-04 15:13
Re: Something I've noticed... 166 RichardC 18-Jan-04 21:58
Re: Something I've noticed... 111 Dominick Ohrbeck 20-Jan-04 07:03
Re: Something I've noticed... 108 Trygve Hogebol 20-Jan-04 08:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 138 fisherman 20-Jan-04 18:56
Re: Something I've noticed... 139 Trygve Hogebol 21-Jan-04 00:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 127 fisherman 21-Jan-04 15:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 144 Melusine 20-Jan-04 18:38
Re: Something I've noticed... 129 Hoppy 29-Jan-04 01:51
Re: Something I've noticed... 171 wirelessguru1 29-Jan-04 02:51
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 121 Nebankh 06-Feb-04 10:35
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 125 Jergat 11-Feb-04 01:02
Re: Pisces 257 Nebankh 11-Feb-04 12:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.