Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David Lamond wrote:
>
> The photon belt thing is completely bogus. If you recall, it
> was supposed to happen in 1996. Nothing happened... The
> Pleiades have nothing to do with earth-consciousness or
> earth's destiny.

Well, I never heard about a photon belt in 1996. As far as I know the major part of the changing of the age was always supposed to be in 2012. But there are always crazies who have absolutely nothing to base their ideas on. Just look at all the people who said 2000 was going to be the end of the world. Complete rubbish based solely on the fact it was a millinium date. Anyone worth their salt in the world of the wise knows that the calendar we follow today in the west has nothing to do with being in harmony with the universe. The correct calendar was always the ancient one, based on the movements of the moon, planets and heavens. And the 2012 date comes from the ancient system, not the Gregorian one.

I would also argue that every body in the universe has something to do with Earth-consciousness and Earth's Destiny. And the human consciousness as a whole does as well. And the sooner we humans as a whole reach an understanding of how we are a part of the creation of that destiny, the better!

Study in the field of human spirituality and wisdom and you would soon learn that the pleiades has always been a system of upmost importance and connection to the Earth. So is Orion. A good starting point for you might be Barbara Marciniak's book called Bringers of the Dawn.

>
> The stars and planets REFLECT the karmas of people and
> nations and planets--they do not cause them.

Ummm. No. Sorry but anyone in the field would tell you this is an incorrect interpretation. And besides, energetically speaking, it makes no sense. And karma has little to do with the stars and planets. Only in a very indirect sense.

This is why
> people have trouble believing in astrology--because they put
> the cart before the horse, and of course it doesn't make sense.

I'm afraid you've got it backwards. Energetics emit from all things affecting all things. It's not the other way around. By your logic its the tides changing that move the moon instead of the moon affecting the movements of the tides.

You seem to think the movements of the Earth, planets, heavens and moon don't have a profound energetic impact on life. I say they do. The ancients knew it, the indigenous peoples know it, and the wise of the world know it as well.

And besides, the evidence is on our side I'm afraid.

Best,
Cleo

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Something I've noticed... 384 Jergat 16-Jan-04 04:39
Yes! ...n/t. 110 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 04:48
Re: Something I've noticed... 99 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 136 Jergat 16-Jan-04 05:17
Re: Something I've noticed... 113 Cleopatra 16-Jan-04 05:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 109 Jergat 16-Jan-04 06:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 139 sean 17-Jan-04 01:37
Re: Something I've noticed... 133 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:06
Re: Something I've noticed... 126 fiascohoho 16-Jan-04 05:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 126 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 20:09
(outside of the Box) .... 107 Thirdwave 16-Jan-04 22:49
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 121 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 07:46
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 104 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 10:00
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 136 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 15:04
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 107 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:26
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 132 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 156 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 22:41
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 132 Briffits 18-Jan-04 22:52
Re: (outside of the Box) .... 101 ArmchairObserver 18-Jan-04 18:00
Re: Something I've noticed... 101 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:11
Re: to explain further 145 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 00:39
Re: to explain further 132 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:00
Re: to explain further 146 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:18
Re: 2012 156 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 01:36
Re: to explain further 128 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 01:44
Re: to explain further 111 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:01
Re: to explain further 133 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 02:11
Re: to explain further 104 Nebankh 17-Jan-04 02:34
Re: to explain further 105 Hoppy 17-Jan-04 03:38
Re: to explain further 100 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:25
Re: to explain further 111 Thirdwave 17-Jan-04 09:26
Re: to explain further 99 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 05:48
Re: to explain further 123 Jergat 17-Jan-04 06:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 100 David L 17-Jan-04 03:49
Re: Something I've noticed... 126 ArmchairObserver 17-Jan-04 08:06
2012 is NOT the end of the world. 112 Cleopatra 17-Jan-04 09:14
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 125 David L 17-Jan-04 16:39
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 103 Cleopatra 18-Jan-04 10:12
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 125 David L 18-Jan-04 17:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 126 David L 18-Jan-04 18:04
No "One Way" but many 102 Thirdwave 19-Jan-04 00:32
Re: No "One Way" but many 111 David L 19-Jan-04 14:57
Re: No "One Way" but many 108 Milo 19-Jan-04 15:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 97 David L 19-Jan-04 23:43
Re: No "One Way" but many 100 Milo 19-Jan-04 23:52
Re: No "One Way" but many 198 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:22
Re: No "One Way" but many 118 Milo 20-Jan-04 00:00
Re: No "One Way" but many 201 Aarooga 20-Jan-04 17:20
Re: No "One Way" but many 115 RichardC 19-Jan-04 16:25
Re: No "One Way" but many 123 David L 19-Jan-04 23:50
Re: No "One Way" but many 129 RichardC 20-Jan-04 14:30
Re: No "One Way" but many 119 Milo 20-Jan-04 14:46
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 108 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:40
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 132 David L 19-Jan-04 23:54
Re: 2012 is NOT the end of the world. 146 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:34
Re: Something I've noticed... 102 David L 17-Jan-04 16:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 142 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 04:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 124 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:55
Re: Something I've noticed... 156 Earache 18-Jan-04 13:44
Re: Something I've noticed... 111 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:06
Read these. 113 Earache 20-Jan-04 15:13
Re: Something I've noticed... 153 RichardC 18-Jan-04 21:58
Re: Something I've noticed... 103 Dominick Ohrbeck 20-Jan-04 07:03
Re: Something I've noticed... 99 Trygve Hogebol 20-Jan-04 08:31
Re: Something I've noticed... 128 fisherman 20-Jan-04 18:56
Re: Something I've noticed... 129 Trygve Hogebol 21-Jan-04 00:07
Re: Something I've noticed... 118 fisherman 21-Jan-04 15:30
Re: Something I've noticed... 132 Melusine 20-Jan-04 18:38
Re: Something I've noticed... 112 Hoppy 29-Jan-04 01:51
Re: Something I've noticed... 155 wirelessguru1 29-Jan-04 02:51
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 111 Nebankh 06-Feb-04 10:35
Re: The changes of ages - great explanatory article 115 Jergat 11-Feb-04 01:02
Re: Pisces 233 Nebankh 11-Feb-04 12:04


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.