No-one with any real sense or understanding of how the process of evolution has been found to work over several billion years says that it is not a continuing process, with additions and variations to the original Darwin book; all of which have helped to improve knowledge and understanding. No doubt, as time goes on, more tweaks and additions will be necessary at times to continue to improve the TofE, but at no time is there likely to be a version which includes any input for any imagined supernatural anything.Quote
You're clearly sticking with a now outdated philosophical version of evolution,
And it is clear that Eddie does not require any explanation or clarification from you!!Quote
and Peder is trying to work with the philosophical implications of a more recent version of the scientific approach that considers newer evidence.
The required gap to allow for any complete refutation of the TofE is so vanishingly small that it can be, for all general purposes, disregarded, but your gap would have to include some kind of God/supernatural-something/etc wouldn't it?Quote
It may be too big a gap to bridge.