You have lost nothing from my viewpoint. I am just like anyone else here who has an interest in science, albeit layman by your standards. You still roost on your stance of science expert!!! Why not let someone explore their own mental imaginings of a very controversial subject? The Quantum will reappear again and again, as it should, by others not so expertise in the sciences. I am doing the favor of quantifying the quanta, for the sake of exploration and understanding. You cannot avoid this matter being a "hot topic"; so, back off!!!. It is all open discussion here!!!!!
Penrose says, essentially, consciousness must function non-algorithmically. Therefore , without restraint or modification. Insights are inclusive, not exclusive. I take this to mean inspirationally and successively. All possibilities are NATURALLY PROBABILISTIC in the realm of Mind. To say that everything must be qualitativey assigned is to put a collar on the animal. An animal is the student of higher functions, even if they are not square on the topic. It is natural inclinations that subsidises any and all inferences to any subject. To hinder such exploratory interests is to halt any and all expositions of the subject at hand. It is unofficially nonsensical to inhibit any and all inquiries into the realm of issues of mind and life.
Lastly, Penrose says, "quantum mechanics might account for non-algorithmic processing in the brain". I am sure you heard of this!!
The virtue of a highly evolved being embraces all people and things and dispels the darkness which isolates them.
Hua Hu Ching-primary lesson.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 08-Sep-19 01:07 by Itatw70s.