Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Ok, Ron!!

While I was watching The Great Course, Mind Body Philosophy, I came upon a corollary between your famous quote and the concepts being taught on the course. It happens sometimes that a spark of intelligible synonymity occurs in my mind. No, I don't suspect you will agree, but humour me. I am allowed to at least open THIS door of comprehension.

1. Not that "one" is,

2. but THAT whereby IS,

3. is.

1. Who is the spectator in my inner theater. Such a theater is imported and subjective. Not that one (spectator) is;

2.The PURELY INTERNAL WORLD. No language can be the Root or Branch (THAT "by what or which means" IS (Reality);

3. The internal dependent upon the imported, external "theory". Not one explanatory picture fits the description of the Internal IN and of ITSELF: co-dependency to explain what "is".

This will be my understanding until further notice.

Uncreated and Uncreatable...
Which neither space nor time touches.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10-Apr-19 21:06 by Itatw70s.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Paradox or Paradigm? 463 Itatw70s 09-Apr-19 19:15
Re: Paradox or Paradigm? 62 Enigcom 09-Apr-19 21:03
Re: Paradox or Paradigm? 94 Itatw70s 10-Apr-19 20:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.