While I was watching The Great Course, Mind Body Philosophy, I came upon a corollary between your famous quote and the concepts being taught on the course. It happens sometimes that a spark of intelligible synonymity occurs in my mind. No, I don't suspect you will agree, but humour me. I am allowed to at least open THIS door of comprehension.
1. Not that "one" is,
2. but THAT whereby IS,
1. Who is the spectator in my inner theater. Such a theater is imported and subjective. Not that one (spectator) is;
2.The PURELY INTERNAL WORLD. No language can be the Root or Branch (THAT "by what or which means" IS (Reality);
3. The internal dependent upon the imported, external "theory". Not one explanatory picture fits the description of the Internal IN and of ITSELF: co-dependency to explain what "is".
This will be my understanding until further notice.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10-Apr-19 21:06 by Itatw70s.
|Paradox or Paradigm?||579||Itatw70s||09-Apr-19 19:15|
|Re: Paradox or Paradigm?||98||Enigcom||09-Apr-19 21:03|
|Re: Paradox or Paradigm?||164||Itatw70s||10-Apr-19 20:51|