It seems that you already rejected the means of art, religion and philosophy right at the beginning of your OP. Look again at your post. I gave you the typical means of transmission of information about art, religion and philosophy. The need for technical proof is evidently in your own arena of interest. Not that it is wrong, but you gave NO CONSIDERATION for art, religion or philosophy from the very start of your OP, meaning that you will not consider even the simplest retrospective of art in my life. Sad. I told you that the methodology is apprenticeship, which you have implied is not valid to your REQUEST for discussion material. But why bother when you clearly implied that you don't expect any explanation from anyone concerning the subject of this OP.
I think that you are repeating your classification syndrome of Objective Evidence ONLY. This tells me that you really are not interested in learning anything whatsoever from those who have experienced the methodologies of art training and other such trends of religion and philosophy.
So, there is nothing to "discuss" since you brushed it off right at the start.
Mind and matter are eternally the same
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Dec-18 00:20 by Itatw70s.