Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
This post of yours is irrelevant and inappropriate in this topic. Put it on one of your other topics.

Susan




Itatw70s Wrote:



-------------------------------------------------------
> I continue my studies of the brain.
>
> Here is a premise that Raymond Cattel and John
> Horn applied to Intelligence:
>
>
> [en.m.wikipedia.org]
> ized_intelligence
>
> If you can tolerate a one-page description of
> intelligence from Wikipedia, then you can assess
> whether a scientific base is involved, or not.
>
> I gave you an explanation, above, of intelligence
> to exclaim that research IS being done to assess
> intelligence in a wide range of people. Some
> people ARE CONTINUING THEIR EDUCATION IN FIELDS OF
> MENTAL CAPACITIES. I find it difficult to accept
> that those who do not, or will not, explore the
> INFINITE CAPACITIES of the Human mind are
> digressing into Narcissism. Who can learn from a
> STATIC point of view? I study to know what and how
> the brain elaborates it's faculties on an everyday
> basis.
>
> When I reached my last two years in high school, I
> APPLIED MYSELF like never before. I was determined
> to graduate no matter what.
>
> Today, I study the brain and its correlate, the
> Mind. You may not accept the idea that personal
> education is paramount to a high intelligence, but
> I too am convinced that other posters here are
> INCREASING THEIR INTELLIGENCE, as you also, AS
> PROOF THAT THERE IS A VERY HAIR-THIN difference
> between the crystallized intelligence and the
> fluid intelligence described in the link above.
>
> Crystallized intelligence continues to learn new
> things and is EVIDENT in a person's life. Fluid
> intelligence is the ABILITY to utilize one's
> knowledge in superfluous situations, like this
> Forum for instance. It is not how much one knows,
> but how one uses what one already has.
>
> Your examination, above, seems to miss the point
> of my post. Obviously, I do not use the english
> language in exactly the same way that you do.
>
> When I said, "we cannot exclude our intimate
> participation in every test of the physical
> phenomena", I was stating that as long as we live
> in a material universe, we are participating
> throughout every second of life from birth to
> death. What you said, "We don't 'participate' in
> tests unless we choose to do so AFTER the idea,
> the hypothesis, the experiments, have been thought
> of and devised by [us]".
>
> I clearly was not understood by you, but I will
> say that we participate in the material universe
> whether we like it or not. That was my meaning.
>
> That's all I will respond to. I will not exhaust
> myself over trivialities of language use. If I
> cannot be understood, then that is the malady of
> COMMUNICATION proper. If we go on like this, we
> will get nowhere.
>
> The burden is on me to clarify. I know this. But
> consider the link above: crystalyzed or fluid
> intelligence. Which is prefered, the crystalized
> INHERENT knowledge that accumulates over a
> lifetime, or the fluid practical reasoning aspect
> of intelligence? I think they call it crystalized
> because each of us moves into a path of
> repetition, even though we add congruent knowledge
> to that base of personal interest. I prefer the
> fluid, reasoning aspect of mind, which is why
> there is so much misunderstanding here on this
> Forum. Not everybody is careful to present a clean
> script as I do. I use the preview function always
> to present my posts.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 19-Dec-18 07:17 by Susan Doris.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Methods 1118 Susan Doris 16-Dec-18 12:35
Re: Methods 129 Eddie Larry 16-Dec-18 15:34
Re: Methods 120 Susan Doris 16-Dec-18 16:39
Re: Methods 125 Eddie Larry 16-Dec-18 18:15
Re: Methods 118 Itatw70s 16-Dec-18 23:59
Re: Methods 116 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 06:29
Re: Methods 123 Eddie Larry 17-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Methods 116 drrayeye 17-Dec-18 08:08
Re: Methods 117 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 08:37
Re: Methods 124 greengirl5 17-Dec-18 09:04
Re: Methods 116 Enigcom 17-Dec-18 12:13
An example 117 drrayeye 17-Dec-18 15:55
Re: An example 110 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 17:20
Re: An example 123 Itatw70s 17-Dec-18 17:57
Re: An example 114 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 07:59
If we accept academic standards, 118 drrayeye 18-Dec-18 13:28
Re: If we accept academic standards, 120 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 15:19
Re: If we accept academic standards, 109 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 16:31
Re: If we accept academic standards, 111 Enigcom 18-Dec-18 17:17
Re: If we accept academic standards, 107 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:35
Re: If we accept academic standards, 110 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:31
Re: If we accept academic standards, 111 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 18:59
Re: If we accept academic standards, 110 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 19:11
Re: If we accept academic standards, 110 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 19:56
Re: If we accept academic standards, 112 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 21:58
Re: If we accept academic standards, 120 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:12
Bee in the bonnet 123 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 07:45
Re: Bee in the bonnet 118 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 08:10
Re: If we accept academic standards, 115 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 06:33
Re: If we accept academic standards, 117 Eddie Larry 19-Dec-18 22:04
Re: If we accept academic standards, 101 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:25
Re: If we accept academic standards, 100 Eddie Larry 22-Dec-18 20:42
Real world example of the scientific method 125 drrayeye 18-Dec-18 19:04
Re: Real world example of the scientific method 122 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 19:27
Statements! 118 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 07:55
Re: If we accept academic standards, 91 drrayeye 27-Dec-18 09:42
Re: If we accept academic standards, 148 Susan Doris 27-Dec-18 13:32
Re: An example 122 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 21:38
Re: An example 110 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:16
Re: An example 112 Enigcom 18-Dec-18 17:14
Re: An example 116 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:42
Re: An example 113 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 22:07
Re: An example 115 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:20
So, try to prove art 114 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 08:00
Re: So, try to prove art 120 Itatw70s 19-Dec-18 12:52
Re: So, try to prove art 108 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:07
Re: So, try to prove art 107 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 00:18
Re: So, try to prove art 97 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 06:55
Re: An example 103 Enigcom 22-Dec-18 13:00
Re: An example 108 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:18
Re: An example 108 greengirl5 22-Dec-18 21:15
Re: An example 113 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 00:32
Re: An example 107 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 09:33
Re: An example 107 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 07:00
Communicate.... 99 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 21:35
Re: An example 107 Enigcom 23-Dec-18 19:24
Re: An example 102 Susan Doris 24-Dec-18 06:27
Happy Christmas everybody, from Australia. 109 greengirl5 24-Dec-18 11:43
a Method for the Holidays 102 drrayeye 24-Dec-18 19:18
Re: a Method for the Holidays 103 Susan Doris 25-Dec-18 06:38
Re: Methods 22 ian 77 11-Jun-19 20:13
Re: Methods 13 Susan Doris 13-Jun-19 05:12
Re: Methods 28 drew 13-Jun-19 07:49


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.