Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
This post of yours is irrelevant and inappropriate in this topic. Put it on one of your other topics.

Susan




Itatw70s Wrote:



-------------------------------------------------------
> I continue my studies of the brain.
>
> Here is a premise that Raymond Cattel and John
> Horn applied to Intelligence:
>
>
> [en.m.wikipedia.org]
> ized_intelligence
>
> If you can tolerate a one-page description of
> intelligence from Wikipedia, then you can assess
> whether a scientific base is involved, or not.
>
> I gave you an explanation, above, of intelligence
> to exclaim that research IS being done to assess
> intelligence in a wide range of people. Some
> people ARE CONTINUING THEIR EDUCATION IN FIELDS OF
> MENTAL CAPACITIES. I find it difficult to accept
> that those who do not, or will not, explore the
> INFINITE CAPACITIES of the Human mind are
> digressing into Narcissism. Who can learn from a
> STATIC point of view? I study to know what and how
> the brain elaborates it's faculties on an everyday
> basis.
>
> When I reached my last two years in high school, I
> APPLIED MYSELF like never before. I was determined
> to graduate no matter what.
>
> Today, I study the brain and its correlate, the
> Mind. You may not accept the idea that personal
> education is paramount to a high intelligence, but
> I too am convinced that other posters here are
> INCREASING THEIR INTELLIGENCE, as you also, AS
> PROOF THAT THERE IS A VERY HAIR-THIN difference
> between the crystallized intelligence and the
> fluid intelligence described in the link above.
>
> Crystallized intelligence continues to learn new
> things and is EVIDENT in a person's life. Fluid
> intelligence is the ABILITY to utilize one's
> knowledge in superfluous situations, like this
> Forum for instance. It is not how much one knows,
> but how one uses what one already has.
>
> Your examination, above, seems to miss the point
> of my post. Obviously, I do not use the english
> language in exactly the same way that you do.
>
> When I said, "we cannot exclude our intimate
> participation in every test of the physical
> phenomena", I was stating that as long as we live
> in a material universe, we are participating
> throughout every second of life from birth to
> death. What you said, "We don't 'participate' in
> tests unless we choose to do so AFTER the idea,
> the hypothesis, the experiments, have been thought
> of and devised by [us]".
>
> I clearly was not understood by you, but I will
> say that we participate in the material universe
> whether we like it or not. That was my meaning.
>
> That's all I will respond to. I will not exhaust
> myself over trivialities of language use. If I
> cannot be understood, then that is the malady of
> COMMUNICATION proper. If we go on like this, we
> will get nowhere.
>
> The burden is on me to clarify. I know this. But
> consider the link above: crystalyzed or fluid
> intelligence. Which is prefered, the crystalized
> INHERENT knowledge that accumulates over a
> lifetime, or the fluid practical reasoning aspect
> of intelligence? I think they call it crystalized
> because each of us moves into a path of
> repetition, even though we add congruent knowledge
> to that base of personal interest. I prefer the
> fluid, reasoning aspect of mind, which is why
> there is so much misunderstanding here on this
> Forum. Not everybody is careful to present a clean
> script as I do. I use the preview function always
> to present my posts.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 19-Dec-18 07:17 by Susan Doris.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Methods 1665 Susan Doris 16-Dec-18 12:35
Re: Methods 243 Eddie Larry 16-Dec-18 15:34
Re: Methods 225 Susan Doris 16-Dec-18 16:39
Re: Methods 250 Eddie Larry 16-Dec-18 18:15
Re: Methods 222 Itatw70s 16-Dec-18 23:59
Re: Methods 243 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 06:29
Re: Methods 232 Eddie Larry 17-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Methods 222 drrayeye 17-Dec-18 08:08
Re: Methods 221 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 08:37
Re: Methods 236 greengirl5 17-Dec-18 09:04
Re: Methods 227 Enigcom 17-Dec-18 12:13
An example 221 drrayeye 17-Dec-18 15:55
Re: An example 224 Susan Doris 17-Dec-18 17:20
Re: An example 217 Itatw70s 17-Dec-18 17:57
Re: An example 222 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 07:59
If we accept academic standards, 225 drrayeye 18-Dec-18 13:28
Re: If we accept academic standards, 229 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 15:19
Re: If we accept academic standards, 219 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 16:31
Re: If we accept academic standards, 257 Enigcom 18-Dec-18 17:17
Re: If we accept academic standards, 248 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:35
Re: If we accept academic standards, 225 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:31
Re: If we accept academic standards, 235 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 18:59
Re: If we accept academic standards, 207 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 19:11
Re: If we accept academic standards, 222 Eddie Larry 18-Dec-18 19:56
Re: If we accept academic standards, 230 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 21:58
Re: If we accept academic standards, 224 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:12
Bee in the bonnet 223 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 07:45
Re: Bee in the bonnet 246 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 08:10
Re: If we accept academic standards, 232 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 06:33
Re: If we accept academic standards, 233 Eddie Larry 19-Dec-18 22:04
Re: If we accept academic standards, 213 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:25
Re: If we accept academic standards, 216 Eddie Larry 22-Dec-18 20:42
Real world example of the scientific method 250 drrayeye 18-Dec-18 19:04
Re: Real world example of the scientific method 234 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 19:27
Statements! 217 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 07:55
Re: If we accept academic standards, 213 drrayeye 27-Dec-18 09:42
Re: If we accept academic standards, 261 Susan Doris 27-Dec-18 13:32
Re: An example 231 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 21:38
Re: An example 206 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:16
Re: An example 224 Enigcom 18-Dec-18 17:14
Re: An example 227 Susan Doris 18-Dec-18 18:42
Re: An example 220 Itatw70s 18-Dec-18 22:07
Re: An example 243 Susan Doris 19-Dec-18 07:20
So, try to prove art 217 greengirl5 19-Dec-18 08:00
Re: So, try to prove art 229 Itatw70s 19-Dec-18 12:52
Re: So, try to prove art 215 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:07
Re: So, try to prove art 200 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 00:18
Re: So, try to prove art 199 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 06:55
Re: An example 221 Enigcom 22-Dec-18 13:00
Re: An example 220 Susan Doris 22-Dec-18 20:18
Re: An example 229 greengirl5 22-Dec-18 21:15
Re: An example 223 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 00:32
Re: An example 214 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 09:33
Re: An example 226 Susan Doris 23-Dec-18 07:00
Communicate.... 191 Itatw70s 23-Dec-18 21:35
Re: An example 218 Enigcom 23-Dec-18 19:24
Re: An example 218 Susan Doris 24-Dec-18 06:27
Happy Christmas everybody, from Australia. 221 greengirl5 24-Dec-18 11:43
a Method for the Holidays 225 drrayeye 24-Dec-18 19:18
Re: a Method for the Holidays 216 Susan Doris 25-Dec-18 06:38
Re: Methods 117 ian 77 11-Jun-19 20:13
Re: Methods 111 Susan Doris 13-Jun-19 05:12
Re: Methods 224 drew 13-Jun-19 07:49


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.