And yet again, in your first few sentences, you presume to tell me what I think and that I have an obsession about something. That is a personal – and totally WRONG – assumption and is a breach of CofC.
> Susan, it is simply a matter of estimation of
> current traits in the world of modern physicists,
> and the expectations of a MORE RADICAL TofE.
> Consciousness is my OBSESSION just as scientific
> autonomy is your passion in this very moment in
> history. It is a scientific trend that is catching
> up to the quantum paradigm of "unbelievable"
> behaviors of the quanta that again and again
> repeat the same scenario of outrageous behaviors
> in the world of tiny things. I can almost choke
> upon the results that physicists are getting each
> time they repeat the experiments. How can
> synchronous particles exist at such long
> distances? And, where does the "observer" connect
> to such an experiment? In SPACE, or in MIND?
> Truly, the course is SET for a new revelation of
> interaction, or is it correlation, with Mind and
> Matter? Even the Buddhists know that mind and
> matter are equal in this vibrant study. These are
> Yin and Yang also; the negative and the positive
> are well known in electronics; even now the
> negative and positive IMPLY a UNION of opposites
> in Reality as we presently assume to know. Why
> does this phenomena occur at all? Little particles
> acting IMPOSSIBLY; while we humans reel over at
> the implications of a new definition of space and
> If you are so informed, then should you not
> consider that matter and mind are interacting AT
> SOME, AS YET, UNKNOWN UNREALIZED LEVEL OF the
> Universe? Take it seriously, because it IS SERIOUS
> to the physicists who are struggling with this
> untapped behavior of small things. I suspect that
> once the answer comes, it will change everything
> we once thought we knew about our world and our
> existence. If we tap into an inquiry of reality,
> then we should also tap into an answer that
> satisfies all conditions of particle behavior and
> our own influence upon those particles. We have
> much to consider before we disenfranchise our
> consciousness from the equation!!!!
> LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP!!!
> In other words, KNOW BEFORE YOU PLUNGE into
> PS. You may be wondering how all of this relates
> to the OP? I suggest that such phenomena of
> particles may very well confirm the bias of some
> people for reincarnation, or, in this thread, the
> afterlife. It may confuse, or, confide with our
> preconceptions. I know that you have indicated
> that our existence just dissolves and vanishes
> over time. Yet, with the realm of the very tiny,
> we are imprinted with our life essence at a level
> of entirety that is commonplace with tiny
> particles that HAVE EXISTED in our very bodies.
> Someone said that we breath oxygen molecules that
> were breathed by famous people of the past: pick a
> name. So, how can we ignore the likelyhood that
> extended existence is not possible in the realm of
> miniscule objects? What manner of MEMORY exists at
> the quantum level? Who is to say that it is
> impossible to endure, especially at that small
> level of existence? Do we truly KNOW so much? I
> say, WE HAVE A LOT TO DISCOVER AND LEARN!!!!