Ray: but I'm certain that nothing you wrote in response to Eddie has any grounding in empirical science--actual studies with methods, statistical analyses, and results. If you tried to make some sort of connection, I doubt that you would have enough understanding of methods and data analyses to understand articles that might give your analyses some credence.
Susan: After your first sentence, this paragraph needs evidence.
Ray: Then provide it. Cite the study--and your analysis.
My characterization of your capabilities is is not pomposity nor looking down--it's pretty obvious. I've completed high school, college, and graduate school science and math classes and carried out or partnered in many scientific studies or technology applications. My reports have survived peer review. You have neither mastered the key concepts in academic institutions, nor participated in experimental research activities. Teaching in elementary school doesn't count.
Susan: And if that isn't a pompous, slightly looking-down-your-nose attitude, then I'd like to know what is!!!
Ray: If anything I said about you in my comparison is inaccurate, let's have it.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13-Nov-18 04:12 by drrayeye.