Well, I’m going to start by asking for citations of what you think isQuote
in my posts, especially since it is clear that the topic I started on sin was over 150 posts and, I think you will agree, was lively and enjoyed by the participants.Quote
swamping …pretentious, non-discussion, imagined-to-be-profound-and-deepy(deeply)-meaningful
You might at this point quote one of Enigcom’s topics which shows over 340 poasts, but please bear in mind that most of them are his –and if you can extract lively discussion-provoking content, then I’ll be amazed.
However, where are the responses, the discussion and exchanges of views following it?Quote
Personally, I saw my most recent contribution as rather handily broaching (at least lightly) upon each of the aforementioned devices permitted to be deployed (in the guide applied to 'Inner Space' phorum topics), 'and so on'.
Mute? I think you mean moot!(Quote
It certainly appears to be affecting your own anti-religious philosophical rhetoric to such a point that being both personally as well as publicly offensive seems perfectly reasonable, in that launching a personal attack upon a fellow contributor becomes a mute point
I’m afraid you flatter yourself a bit too much here!!
Not at all. At 82, I am quietly secure in myself, with no hang-ups, no complexes, and no illusions or delusions about myself or the world.Quote
perhaps even laudable)from your psychological perspective and/or need. Perhaps this is indicative of an area of your own personal development which is adversely affected (or perhaps aggravated) by a perception of self-worth.
I might have missed that – my blindness is a bit of a nuisance at times!Quote
I assure you, your conclusion regarding my contribution (less than indiscreet certainly), is incorrect (and misdirected). Of a truth I tell you, your anti-religious perspective was indeed touched upon (though not overtly) in my most recent 'add' to the discussion at hand.
On the contrary, since you are new here, it wasn’t your fault. It was just another long, long post with, as far as I could hear, no starting point for an interesting discussion.Quote
Do I fail meet your expectations otherwise as well? If so, I humbly apologize for perceptibly having driven you to this point, a level of almost apoplectic impropriety in your manner of describing my own loquacity in this discussion.
And that is patronising.Quote
While I may not be as brief (nor direct) as some here, you clearly indicate a belief the result is a form of handicap for me. Frankly, my dear, I do not.
Thank you, nevertheless, for your opine. You have certainly achieved notice (perhaps even a tad more notoriety) with a twopence contribution to the discussion at hand, which (on the surface) surely you yourself must admit is lighter on qualified topic matter (as defined in the guide to the 'Inner Space' phorum) than my own.
so is that – though less so!!Quote
Have a wonderful day, Susan. Whatever blesses your existence most, I hope it richly rewards you according to the amount effort you expend toward that end.
I have been a member here for a long time and am continually grateful for the presence of this forum because it was the first I found and it was something I could do, in spite of my severe sight loss.