Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
>But why take the test images with the colour calibration markers if the
>ones taken during the mission will not show the same colours?

So that you have an element of comparision.

>I don't think there's a conspiracy or cover up, I just want to know why
>NASA appears to fiddle with its images so much. SO much so that blue
>becomes red...lol

Well, perhaps there just wasn't a picture taken on a wavelength anything close to blue... it's not like they get a perfectly good RGB picture and dispose of the blue ;)

I think the biggest conspiracy I'd consider on that one (not that that's what I think is going on) is that years ago, they could have made a mistake, honnest or not, and that nobody ever took upon himself to say "okay, we were wrong", for a mix of reasons. First because in the end it's not that important, and perhaps second because people like Hoaxland would be all like "I told you so, and that's proof that we're right on the rest too".

Seriously tho, the "vacation mission" idea may seem far fetched but why not... a rover mission is a few hundred millions of dollars, and for that cost you get a blockbuster movie nowadays. A movie is entertainment, and this is what such a mission would be at its core, and it would be for those who get turned on more by a high framerate/high resolution flight through mars in surround sound than by the day to day spectroscopic analysis of martian soil. Scientifically it doesn't even compare, but the sad truth is that most people don't actually care about science, they care about the fruits of science. I say sad, because I think it'd be terrific if everybody knew enough to get excited over soil analysis, but since it's not the case, we shouldn't be elitist and reserve space to science and scientists. It's a playground out there, too.

Well, not yet, but give me a space elevator and i'll make it happen :D

Francis.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
NASA doctors Mars images... 514 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 15:10
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 157 Kees 26-Feb-04 17:11
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 170 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 17:21
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 169 Kees 26-Feb-04 17:31
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 165 lone 26-Feb-04 19:00
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 171 Mercury Rapids 26-Feb-04 19:37
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 187 lone 26-Feb-04 20:28
They are doing it all the time 168 Nejc 27-Feb-04 08:29
See also: 162 Nejc 27-Feb-04 13:45
Re: They are doing it all the time 177 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 02:17
Interesting...n/t 148 Nejc 28-Feb-04 06:21
Watch out there! 165 Nejc 28-Feb-04 07:36
Re: Watch out there! 279 ArmchairObserver 01-Mar-04 16:15
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 151 cardinal guzman 26-Feb-04 22:36
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 167 ArmchairObserver 27-Feb-04 07:30
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 155 Brew99 27-Feb-04 13:27
So it IS BLUE!n/t 174 Nejc 27-Feb-04 13:37
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 132 ArmchairObserver 27-Feb-04 16:20
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 146 Nejc 27-Feb-04 17:49
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 156 Zosimos 27-Feb-04 23:38
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 126 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 02:11
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 169 Zosimos 28-Feb-04 03:22
Yes Vonnegut was gut..n/t 168 Nejc 28-Feb-04 06:24
Re: NASA doctors Mars images... 177 gates and variations 28-Feb-04 12:59
Re: NASA and deception 145 Thunderbird 29-Feb-04 04:06
Re: NASA and deception 132 Nejc 29-Feb-04 09:26
Off topic 170 Richard Fusniak 29-Feb-04 15:20
Sometimes... 158 Nejc 29-Feb-04 16:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.